Honduras: When is a coup not a coup?
The Obama administration has condemned the removal of Honduran president Manuel Zelaya as illegal and referred to it as a coup. The administration is in good company; Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Ecuador’s Rafael Correa, Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega, Cuban dictator Raúl Castro, Rafael Correa in Ecuador, Evo Morales in Bolivia, and Álvaro Uribe in Colombia all agree with the Obama administration.
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehiten (R-FL), ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee stated that Zelaya was “moving to re-write the Honduran constitution to extend and expand his power, while retaliating against those who stand in the way.”
On June 28 the Honduran attorney general charged Zelaya with deliberately violating Honduran law and the Supreme Court ordered his arrest in Tegucigalpa. President Zelaya had attempted to hold a referendum (or poll) to establish a National Constituent Assembly, with a mandate to write a completely new constitution. The Supreme Court of Honduras, Congress, the country's attorney general, and the supreme electoral tribunal opposed the poll and in fact the Congress (to include his own party) began discussing impeachment proceedings. The Supreme Court ordered the head of the Honduran military staff General Vásquez not to distribute the poll materials required for the referendum at which time the President fired him. The Honduran Supreme Court ruled the firing of General Vásquez unconstitutional. President Zelaya went ahead with his plans which culminated in his arrest by the military.
This placed the President in violation of three articles of the Honduran constitution; Article 4 which provides that any 'infraction' of the succession rules constitutes treason", Article 205, which says the legislature has the authority to decide whether charges can be brought against the president, to approve or disapprove of the administrative conduct of the executive branch, and to name a special commission to investigate matters of national interest.and Article 239 of the Constitution, which states that “whomever changes or attempts to change” Article 4 relating to the form of government and the limits of presidential terms, “will be immediately removed from public office”. Therefore, on June 25, Zelaya was no longer the President of Honduras, per ruling of the Supreme Court on June 26. The authority for his arrest was in accordance with Article 272 of the Honduran Constitution which states, “The Honduran Armed Forces are a National Institution of permanent nature, essentially professional, non-political, obedient, and non-deliberating. They are constituted to defend the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Republic, keep the peace, public order, and Constitutional Rule, the principles of free suffrage, and the alternability in the exercise of the Presidency of the Republic".
Many elements of the media have called it a military coup, apparently not bothering to conduct any research or acknowledging the fact the Honduran military immediately turned power over to head of Congress Roberto Micheletti, the next in line following the President. The Honduran military whisked him out of the country, to Costa Rica, when it executed the court's order, which was itself apparently a violation of the constitution. The "new" government stated they did so to avoid bloodshed.
New elections are planned for 29th November 2009.
President Zelaya has had a few problems in the past regarding his countries constitution. According to the Wall Street Journal:
"Besides eagerly trampling the constitution, Mr. Zelaya had demonstrated that he was ready to employ the violent tactics of chavismo to hang onto power. The decision to pack him off immediately was taken in the interest of protecting both constitutional order and human life.As regards the referendum or poll? According to a story carried by Europapress:
Two incidents earlier this year make the case. The first occurred in January when the country was preparing to name a new 15-seat Supreme Court, as it does every seven years. An independent board made up of members of civil society had nominated 45 candidates. From that list, Congress was to choose the new judges.
Mr. Zelaya had his own nominees in mind, including the wife of a minister, and their names were not on the list. So he set about to pressure the legislature. On the day of the vote he militarized the area around the Congress and press reports say a group of the president's men, including the minister of defense, went to the Congress uninvited to turn up the heat. The head of the legislature had to call security to have the defense minister removed.
In the end Congress held its ground and Mr. Zelaya retreated. But the message had been sent: The president was willing to use force against other institutions.
In May there was an equally scary threat to peace issued by the Zelaya camp as the president illegally pushed for a plebiscite on rewriting the constitution. Since the executive branch is not permitted to call for such a vote, the attorney general had announced that he intended to enforce the law against Mr. Zelaya. A week later some 100 agitators, wielding machetes, descended on the attorney general's office. "We have come to defend this country's second founding," the group's leader reportedly said. "If we are denied it, we will resort to national insurrection."
These experiences frightened Hondurans because they strongly suggested that Mr. Zelaya, who had already aligned himself with Mr. Chávez, was now emulating the Venezuelan's power-grab. Other Chávez protégés -- in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua -- have done the same, refusing to accept checks on their power, making use of mobs and seeking to undermine institutions."
Several computers containing the results of the referendum Zelaya wanted to conduct are seized at the Presidential Palace. The National Directors of Criminal Investigation seized various computers from the Presidential Palace that had recorded the supposed results of the referendum to reform the constitution that the deposed leader, Manuel Zelaya, was planning to conduct on July (sic) 28, the day he was removed from office.
The official investigation now deals with the possible crime of fraud and falsification of documents due to the fact that some of the certified voting results had been filled with the personal information of individuals that supposedly participated in the failed referendum that did not take place because of the coup.
One of the district attorneys that participated in the operation that took place this Friday showed reporters an official voting result from the Technical Institute Luis Bogran, of Tegucigalpa, in which the specific number of people that participated in table 345, where there were 550 ballots, 450 of which were votes in favor of Zelaya's proposal and 30 were against, in addition to 20 blank ballots and 30 ballots, which were nullified.
The seizure took place on the third floor of the building attached to the Ministry of the Presidency that had been rented to the ex-minister of the Interior, Enrique Flores Lanza. The deputy district attorney, Roberto Ramirez, declared this area as a "crime scene" and, although he did not want to provide further details, said that further evidence had been found that could be categorized as crimes of fraud, embezzlement of funds, falsification of documents, and abuse of authority.Sounds as if President Zelaya had some members of ACORN as election consultants.
I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.






This page added to Google cache Cached: http://google.com/search?q=cache:http://ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com/2009/07/15/hondoras-when-is-a-coup-not-a-coup.aspx?ref=rss&ei=AFQjCNHajN_OX0kgxzx7UGA1yBfPoRn TubedfWq
Reply to this
a democracy of idiots will never result in good government…. and as bad as it may sound a good many countries especially in Africa do not have the educated population necessary for a democracy to work. Are people that believe in voodoo ready to vote?
Reply to this