
"Besides eagerly trampling the constitution, Mr. Zelaya had demonstrated that he was ready to employ the violent tactics of chavismo to hang onto power. The decision to pack him off immediately was taken in the interest of protecting both constitutional order and human life.As regards the referendum or poll? According to a story carried by Europapress:
Two incidents earlier this year make the case. The first occurred in January when the country was preparing to name a new 15-seat Supreme Court, as it does every seven years. An independent board made up of members of civil society had nominated 45 candidates. From that list, Congress was to choose the new judges.
Mr. Zelaya had his own nominees in mind, including the wife of a minister, and their names were not on the list. So he set about to pressure the legislature. On the day of the vote he militarized the area around the Congress and press reports say a group of the president's men, including the minister of defense, went to the Congress uninvited to turn up the heat. The head of the legislature had to call security to have the defense minister removed.
In the end Congress held its ground and Mr. Zelaya retreated. But the message had been sent: The president was willing to use force against other institutions.
In May there was an equally scary threat to peace issued by the Zelaya camp as the president illegally pushed for a plebiscite on rewriting the constitution. Since the executive branch is not permitted to call for such a vote, the attorney general had announced that he intended to enforce the law against Mr. Zelaya. A week later some 100 agitators, wielding machetes, descended on the attorney general's office. "We have come to defend this country's second founding," the group's leader reportedly said. "If we are denied it, we will resort to national insurrection."
These experiences frightened Hondurans because they strongly suggested that Mr. Zelaya, who had already aligned himself with Mr. Chávez, was now emulating the Venezuelan's power-grab. Other Chávez protégés -- in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua -- have done the same, refusing to accept checks on their power, making use of mobs and seeking to undermine institutions."
Several computers containing the results of the referendum Zelaya wanted to conduct are seized at the Presidential Palace. The National Directors of Criminal Investigation seized various computers from the Presidential Palace that had recorded the supposed results of the referendum to reform the constitution that the deposed leader, Manuel Zelaya, was planning to conduct on July (sic) 28, the day he was removed from office.
The official investigation now deals with the possible crime of fraud and falsification of documents due to the fact that some of the certified voting results had been filled with the personal information of individuals that supposedly participated in the failed referendum that did not take place because of the coup.
One of the district attorneys that participated in the operation that took place this Friday showed reporters an official voting result from the Technical Institute Luis Bogran, of Tegucigalpa, in which the specific number of people that participated in table 345, where there were 550 ballots, 450 of which were votes in favor of Zelaya's proposal and 30 were against, in addition to 20 blank ballots and 30 ballots, which were nullified.
The seizure took place on the third floor of the building attached to the Ministry of the Presidency that had been rented to the ex-minister of the Interior, Enrique Flores Lanza. The deputy district attorney, Roberto Ramirez, declared this area as a "crime scene" and, although he did not want to provide further details, said that further evidence had been found that could be categorized as crimes of fraud, embezzlement of funds, falsification of documents, and abuse of authority.Sounds as if President Zelaya had some members of ACORN as election consultants.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual,uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records,for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise;the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners;refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations,which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence.They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America,in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War,conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.


WASILLA, Alaska -- In a stunning announcement, Gov. Sarah Palin said Friday morning she will resign her office in a few weeks.
Speculation has swirled for weeks, perhaps months that Palin would not seek re-election in 2010 as she pursues a political career on the national stage. The former vice presidential candidate has long been rumored to be considering a run at the Republican presidential nomination in 2012.
Palin did not address those rumors at the press conference at her Wasilla home, during which she did not take questions from reporters.
Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell will be inaugurated as her successor at the Governor's Picnic at Pioneer Park in Fairbanks on Sunday, July 26, Palin said.
Parnell said he will seek election to the governor's office in 2010. Parnell ran for Congress unsuccessfully against Rep. Don Young in the Republican primary last year.
Palin made the announcement flanked by Parnell and all of her cabinet. She said that recent incidents brought up by national media and the spate of ethics complaints have been taking away from her mission to serve Alaska.
She felt that it would be best to step aside and let Parnell and her cabinet continue. Palin said she discussed the decision with her family, and they were united in their support of her decision to step down.
In a story carried by the Washington Post as Palin aide stated the first term Governor is stepping down "so that she can take the fight for her issues elsewhere.". This makes a lot of sense as the logistics of running a Presidential campaign as a seated Governor are..... impractical at best. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts are already in campaign mode. Pawlenty announced his decision not to run for a third term as Governor this week in order to devote his time to the Presidential campaign while Romney is already retired.
Being located in Alaska presents many problems while running. They are four hours behind East Coast time zone and almost an entire days travel time to get to any campaign destination. This makes any campaign stop a minimum two day trip any from her duties.
Palin will need the next few years to build a cohesive campaign machine. She will need to be visible to people around the nation as well as GOP strategists. Palin will need to firmly establish herself as a Conservative, not as someone running on a very liberal Republican candidates ticket; this is an image that will have to be corrected.
Governor Palin has a long hard road ahead of her given the medias attitude and "open season" approach to covering her in the news. She has to attempt to undue the damage left over from the McCain campaign committee and their sniping attacks on her throughout the campaign. And apparently continues as John Weaver, a longtime friend and confidant of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) comments, "We've seen a lot of nutty behavior from governors and Republican leaders in the last three months, but this one is at the top of that."
She has easily established her credentials as a viable political candidate. Let us hope this starts her bid for President of the United States.
By the way, Governor Palin has a campaign PAC now at SarahPac
UPDATE:
12:00pm AKST - Update from Governor Palin: We'll soon attach info on decision to not seek re-election... this is in Alaska's best interest, my family's happy... it is good, stay tuned.I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.
...I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.
So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted...
I would say off hand President Obamas intentions are fairly clear on this bill as well as the other bills he has pushed through.Gates stated on Thursday the military is "watching" that situation "very closely," and would have "some concerns" if North Korea launched a missile in the direction of Hawaii. But he expressed confidence in U.S. ability to handle such a launch. Gates said he's directed the deployment of the Theater High Altitude Area Defense, a mobile missile defense system used for knocking down long- and medium-range missiles.
"The ground-based interceptors are clearly in a position to take action. So, without telegraphing what we will do, I would just say ... I think we are in a good position, should it become necessary, to protect the American territory."
On Wednesday, a military radar system — shaped like a giant golf ball — slowly disappeared from Hawaii's coast as it headed out to sea. The 28-story missile X-Band defense radar is designed to work with ground-based missile interceptors on the island of Kauai to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles during their final phase of flight. The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system was returned to Hawaii after the mobile launcher recently was tested at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
Since 2005, all six tests of the ground-based missile system have intercepted their targets, excluding tests when the targets malfunctioned, Missile Defense Agency spokeswoman Pam Rogers said.
This will be a superb opportunity to see our missile defense program, of which President Obama cut over $1 billion from the budget, the day after North Korea fired its missile.
It is doubtful if the missile which has a range of 4,000 miles (6,500 kilometers), could hit the main islands of Hawaii which is 4,500 miles (7,200 kilometers) from North Korea. But, the firing of the missile is a direct affront to the UN sanctions and the United States.
According to intelligence analysts, North Korea's missiles could strike the U.S. within three years if its weapons growth goes unchecked, but this does not mean they lack the capability at this moment.
However, The independent International Crisis Group said the North is believed to have between 2,500 and 5,000 tons of chemical weapons, including mustard gas, phosgene, blood agents and sarin. These weapons can be delivered with ballistic missiles and long-range artillery and are "sufficient to inflict massive civilian casualties on South Korea." South Korea's annual defense report, published early this year, said that in addition to chemical weapons, the North is believed to be capable of producing biological weapons with agents like anthrax and smallpox.
The logical portion of my brain tells me this is merely more posturizing on the part of the diminutive little North Korean dictator. The logical side of my brain believes this is an attempt to make himself look big to his people. Some analysts believe that the North's rhetoric is aimed at showing people at home that their government can defy the powerful U.S., and giving credit for it to Kim's reported heir apparent, Kim Jong Un. The analysts say this would make Jong Un's ascent to the top acceptable to the North Koreans. Now, does this rhetoric still work out well for him if he doesn't actually fire the missile? Or if it self destructs on the launch pad creating a nuclear blast seen from outer space? Or if, like the last launch the missile falls into the ocean 40 seconds into flight?
However, there is also that part of my brain that tells me the world has seen many "mad as hatter" nutjob dictators that come to believe their own hype and propaganda and have led their countries to total destruction. Is North Korea soon to be added to the list? Assuming President Obama takes any action....... other than a strongly worded letter of protest.
"My teachers, my colleagues and my friends" is how Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr described Justice Department career attorneys. He further described them as the "backbone" of the department. "If I am confirmed as attorney general, I will listen to them, respect them and make them proud of the vital goals we will pursue together," he said during his January confirmation hearings.
Apparently not quite so much if the events that transpired earlier this week within the Justice Department are any indication.
Political appointees within the Justice Department overruled the career attorneys that had been working since the election on charges of voter intimidation by three members of the New Black Panthers at a Philadelphia polling place. The career Justice lawyers were on the verge of securing sanctions against the men earlier this month when their political appointed superiors ordered them to reverse course, according to interviews and documents. The court had already entered a default judgment against the men on April 20.
A little background.
Longtime readers of my blog will remember a story carried on 6 November "Random Thoughts on the Election" in which I mentioned voter intimidation by these Black Panthers.
The civil suit filed Jan. 7 identified the three men, New Black Panther Chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz, Minister King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson, as members of the Panthers and said they wore military-style uniforms, black berets, combat boots, battle-dress pants, black jackets with military-style insignias and were armed with "a dangerous weapon"and used racial slurs and insults to scare would-be voters and those there to assist them at the Philadelphia polling location on Nov. 4. Malik Zulu Shabazz is a Washington, D.C., resident, not a Philadelphian. Mr. Jackson was an elected member of Philadelphia's 14th Ward Democratic Committee, and was credentialed to be at the polling place last Nov. 4 as an official Democratic Party polling observer, according to the Philadelphia City Commissioner's Office. Although I'm not convinced his elected position entitled him to wear a pseudo-military uniform or carry a nightstick.
According to the complaint, Malik Zulu Shabazz, a Howard University Law School graduate, said the placement of King Samir Shabazz and Mr. Jackson in Philadelphia was part of a nationwide effort to deploy New Black Panther Party members at polling locations on Election Day.
According to The Washington Times,
To support its evidence, the government had secured an affidavit from Bartle Bull, a longtime civil rights activist and former aide to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign. Mr. Bull said in a sworn statement dated April 7 that he was serving in November as a credentialed poll watcher in Philadelphia when he saw the three uniformed Panthers confront and intimidate voters with a nightstick.
"In my opinion, the men created an intimidating presence at the entrance to a poll," he declared. "In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi ... I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location."
Mr. Bull said the "clear purpose" of what the Panthers were doing was to "intimidate voters with whom they did not agree." He also said he overheard one of the men tell a white poll watcher: "You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."
He called their conduct an "outrageous affront to American democracy and the rights of voters to participate in an election without fear." He said it was a "racially motivated effort to limit both poll watchers aiding voters, as well as voters with whom the men did not agree."
A Justice Department spokesman on Thursday confirmed that the agency had dropped the case, dismissing two of the men from the lawsuit with no penalty and winning an order against the third man that simply prohibits him from bringing a weapon to a polling place in future elections.
Bringing weapons to a polling place? I was always under the impression that was illegal to start with. I wasn't aware it took a court order to state that rather obvious fact.
Even with Mr. Bulls sworn affidavit and the video tape (below), the current administration and their political appointed attorneys in the Justice Department apparently feel there were no laws violated or civil liberties violated.
“The teenagers and college students who left their homes to march in the streets of Birmingham and Montgomery; the mothers who walked instead of taking the bus after a long day of doing somebody else's laundry and cleaning somebody else's kitchen — they didn't brave fire hoses and Billy clubs so that their grandchildren and their great-grandchildren would still wonder at the beginning of the 21st century whether their vote would be counted; whether their civil rights would be protected by their government; whether justice would be equal and opportunity would be theirs. . . . We have more work to do.”
— Barack Obama, Speech at Howard University, September 28, 2007

Once again, welcome to Maryland. Welcome to Prince George’s County, Maryland. This is my birthplace, the place where I raised my family and the place of my first leadership position in the Republican Party.
It was a tough job – and the pay wasn’t very good. Most of my time was spent walking neighborhoods, licking envelopes, and making phone calls for the County Republican Party.
You don’t know lonely until you announce: “Hi, I’m from the Prince George’s County Republican Party.”
But, I learned a great deal; and it served as a foundation on my journey to becoming....
...County Chairman, State Chairman and the first African American elected statewide.You are in the place where this incredible journey began; a place that is very special to me.
Many of you may know this story, so forgive me for re-telling it, but it speaks to who I am and why I am particularly honored that you have chosen me to serve as your chairman.
I was born about 20 minutes from here at Andrews Air Force Base and raised in our nation’s capital. I was adopted by my mother and father, a father who suffered from his addictions and his temper and who died when I was 4 years old.
So, my mother Maebell raised me on the salary of laundry worker, having earned no more than $3.83/hour on the day she retired. But, she had managed by her perseverance and the help of her new husband, John, to send me to parochial school, John Carroll High School, and Johns Hopkins University. I would go on to attend Georgetown University Law School while my sister Monica would become the doctor in the family.
So, I think I know something about confronting the odds.
In 2002, I was approached by then-Congressman Bob Ehrlich to run with him as his Lt. Governor. It was an uphill battle. No Republican had won the governorship of Maryland since Spiro Agnew. More importantly, we ran against Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, the daughter of Robert F. Kennedy and Uncle Teddy’s little niece. We ran an unconventional campaign that wooed a number of Democrats to our side. We built coalitions and met with a diverse community of civic, religious and political leaders in their neighborhoods and places of worship.
On election night when the votes were counted, we made history becoming the first winning Republican ticket in 40 years and beating back the status quo thinking that it could not be done.
So, I know little something about winning against the odds.
I wanted to begin with that reflection to create the context for what comes next: Lessons learned; lessons that have shaped me as your chairman and that will shape us as a party.
We are at a crucial juncture for our party, and more importantly for our country. Simply put, America needs us now more than ever before. It’s time to rise to the occasion. It’s time to make our voices heard. It’s time to serve our country as the loyal opposition.
We all realize that the Democrats want us to be silent. They want to diminish our voice, and they even want to try to suggest that by being the loyal opposition we are in some way being less than patriotic. You’ve heard the suggestion that if we oppose the president’s policies we are in some crazy way rooting against American success.
But we also know nothing could be further from the truth. The fact is, we would be abandoning our responsibility if we were to be silent while they spend our country into the abyss, while they borrow money we don’t have, and while they usher in the most massive expansion of federal government control in the history of our Republic.
Well, I’ve got news for them. We aren’t going to be silent. We are going to speak up, and we are going to show that we have the courage of our convictions. We will not be afraid to agree with the president when we believe he is doing what is best for America, but neither will we be afraid to disagree with the president when we believe his actions are hurting our country.
So, today I’m going to talk to you about some very important turning points for our party.
The first turning point is this: Today we are declaring an end to the era of Republicans looking backward.
We have just endured two successive elections where we were soundly defeated. As a result, many of us, me included, have done some soul searching. We have looked closely at the places we went wrong, we have talked openly and publicly about our mistakes and our deficiencies.
If you don’t learn from the past, you are of course destined to repeat it. This has been a difficult, yet healthy and necessary task for our party.
People are sick of politicians and political parties who never own up to their mistakes. We have done so. We lost our way on spending and we owned up to that. We came to Washington to change it and in some ways we let Washington change us, and we owned up to that. We’ve taken some important steps to recover our values and our senses, and we can say we see the world with a clearer head and a sharper vision.
The era of apologizing for Republican mistakes of the past is now officially over. It is done. The time for trying to fix or focus on the past has ended. The era of Republican navel gazing is over. We have turned the corner on regret, recrimination, self-pity and self-doubt. Now is the hour to focus all of our energies on winning the future.
The Republican Party is again going to emerge as the party of new ideas. It will take some time, for sure, but it is beginning now. Our governors are emerging with fresh answers to old problems. Some of our brightest stars in Congress are emerging with new approaches. New groups and new entities are being formed. Republicans are rising once again with the energy, the focus, and the determination to turn our timeless principles into new solutions for the future.
The introspection is now over. The corner has been turned.
The second turning point for our party is this: We are going to take the president head-on. The honeymoon is over. The two-party system is making a comeback, and that comeback starts today.
The Democrats are in power. They wanted it and now we are going to make them own the results of their arrogance of power: Policies that are hurting the long-term health of our country. We are going to give voice to the growing chorus of Americans who realize that there is a difference between creating wealth and redistributing wealth. And we are not going to be shy about it. Simply put, we are going to speak truth to power.
There has been a great deal of talk in Republican circles about how we should deal withPresident Obama and the entire Obama phenomenon. Many have suggested that we need to be careful, that we need to tip-toe around President Obama, that we have to be careful not to take him on, at least not directly.
This has led to some hand-wringing among Republicans; and quite frankly some missed opportunities.
We’ve seen strategists writing memos and doing briefings urging that Republicans avoid confronting the President. Steer clear of any frontal assaults on his Administration, they warn.
They suggest that instead we should go after Nancy Pelosi, whom nobody likes.
Or Harry Reid, whom nobody knows.
Or this Tim Geithner fellow, whom nobody believes.
Or maybe even Barney Frank, whom nobody understands.
You know the thinking. In the same way that the Democrats target conservative talk show hosts and former vice presidents, we should also engage in some misdirection, just like they do.
The argument goes that we should be careful here, because the polls suggest that President Obama is popular.
Well, the president is personally popular. Pity the fool who paid for a poll to figure that out. Folks like him. He’s got an easy demeanor. He’s a great orator. His campaign was based on change and hope. He’s young. He’s cool. He’s hip. He’s got a good looking family. What’s not to like? He’s got all the qualities America likes in a celebrity, so, of course he is popular.
There’s only one problem. He’s taking us in the wrong direction and bankrupting our country. Were it not for that little detail, I’d be a big fan too.
This popular politician who is our president is engaged in the most massive expansion of the old industrial age model of government that our country has ever seen. This popular politician is spending America into debt of such mammoth proportions that none of us can even begin to calculate it or really understand it. The numbers are so big that they seem impossible.
If we have the courage of our convictions, and we do, then we will and we must stand against these disastrous policies, regardless of the president’s personal popularity. This is not a game, this is not a popularity contest, and this is not American Idol. This is the future of our country that is at stake.
The guy who campaigned in favor of bottom-up style of governing is presiding over the most massive top down expansion of government bureaucracy and spending our country has ever seen or even contemplated.
Candidate Obama was very moderate in his views, but President Obama could not possibly be further to the far left.
Candidate Obama talked about fiscal responsibility, about government living within its means. But President Obama is saddling our unborn grandchildren with mountains of debt.
Candidate Obama boasted about cutting taxes, but President Obama will have to raise taxes to pay for his massive top-down government explosion.
Candidate Obama was all about being bipartisan, but President Obama could not be more partisan, yielding his legislative agenda almost entirely to radicals like Nancy Pelosi.
So…what’s the loyal opposition to do with this popular president? We are going to speak truth to power. We are going to speak directly, and we are going to take him on.
This is not about personalities. This is about the very sizeable gap emerging between America’s opinion of President Obama the man, and America’s opinion of President Obama’s policies. In fact, it’s not a gap, it’s a chasm.
In the end we are all about ideals, principles, policies, and ideas. We have only one goal, and it’s not power.It’s not majorities. It’s success for America.
The honeymoon is over. We are going to challenge those policies that we believe are wrong, and we are going to do so without apology and without a second thought.
But there is a very important distinction I want to make here.
We are going to take this president on with class. We are going to take this president on with dignity. This will be a very sharp and marked contrast to the shabby and classless way that the Democrats and the far left spoke of President Bush.
We’ve just seen a bunch of news stories on President Obama’s first 100 days in office. Predictably, most in the media were fawning all over the president.
But I wouldn’t break ground on the Mall for his monument just yet, as his policies are increasingly unpopular with the American people.
The American people aren’t worried about polls. The American people are worried about jobs, foreclosures, bailouts, taxes, spending, and debt. While the Obama Administration is giving the banks a stress test, they are also giving the American people a tremendous amount of stress.
Let’s look at the first 100 days of President Obama’s “reign of error” in a factual manner, not in terms of his speeches, but in terms of his actions:
• Under President Obama the federal government is now in the banking business.
• Under President Obama the government now makes cars.
• Under President Obama our country has amassed debts that will take generations to repay.
• Under President Obama America is increasingly in debt to foreign countries, from China to the Middle East.
• President Obama now wants to cap and tax every single American into paying higher utility rates.
• President Obama and his allies in Congress have now put their taxing eyes on soft drinks.
• President Obama and Democrat leaders want a brand new tax on our health care benefits and are devising a plan to give federal government bureaucrats control of our health care system.
• President Obama is backing a plan to take away the basic right of every American worker to cast a private ballot.
• President Obama has for the first time in our history politicized the US Census process by putting political appointees in his White House in charge of it and wanting a corrupt, fraudulent organization to run it.
• President Obama and his far left allies are flirting with an attempt to squelch the basic freedom of speech of our nation’s airwaves.
• President Obama’s Attorney General is trying to use Mexican drug gang wars as a reason to advocate a new gun ban in America.
• President Obama’s Administration has disparaged our war heroes and veterans by suggesting that they are a threat to our safety, when the truth is they are the cause of our safety.
• The president, who thinks that every student should be able to go to college, is cutting much needed funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities.
• The president, who pledged that he would create millions of jobs through federal public works projects, now requires project labor agreements on such projects which effectively denies small and minority owned businesses access to those jobs because they are not unionized.
• And the one the galls me the most: While the president sends his kids to a private school, he is at the very same time taking away opportunity scholarships from poor Hispanic and African-American kids right here in our nation’s capital.
Those are the facts of the president’s first 100 days.
The last Democrat President declared that the era of big government was over. Can some please send President Obama a copy of that memo! Because this new Democrat President has ushered in a new era of left wing, old school, top down, Industrial Age, bureaucratic Big Government the likes of which our country has never seen.
It is all designed for short-term political pay-off, with potentially catastrophic long-term effects on our nation’s economic prosperity.
Our nation’s unemployment rate has climbed to a 25 year high. The gross domestic product, the best indicator of our economic health, was down 6.1 percent in the last quarter.
Two and half million Americans have lost their jobs this year alone. Just last month, when 530,000 Americans lost their jobs, this Administration tried to spin this as progress.
Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama are planning an America where there are more people moving down the ladder of opportunity than moving up the ladder of opportunity. They are planning for an America that is more dependent, less industrious and less ambitious than our nation’s ideals.
That is not the kind of America Republicans envision.
As the next 100 days unfold, the president and the Democrat Party would be wise to remember these timeless truths:
“You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.”
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.”
“You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.”
“You cannot further the brotherhood of man by encouraging class hatred.”
“You cannot establish security by borrowing money.”
“You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.”
“You cannot build character and courage by taking away one’s initiative and incentive.”
“You cannot help individuals permanently by doing for them what they should do for themselves.”
The honeymoon is over. It’s time to speak truth to power.
The third turning point is this: The Republican comeback has begun. It is underway, and it is not in Washington.
I may not know much, but I do know that our comeback is well underway in states all across America.
I’ve had the opportunity to meet with all of you in five regional roundtables in each part of the country. We did those meetings behind the scenes, out of the public eye. That gave us a great opportunity to speak candidly with each other, a chance to review our strategies and tactics, a chance to learn from each other, and a chance to be very direct with each other.
I’ve also had the honor of speaking in 23 different states in the past 100 days. From Oregon to Idaho, from Wisconsin to Indiana, from Florida to Georgia, the energy among the grassroots is strong.
Too bad the chattering classes inside the Beltway are too busy fretting over phony disputes and intra-party intrigue to notice that a change has indeed come to America. But it’s not the one the Obama Administration wants aired on the nightly news.
Those of you who live outside of Washington know what I’m talking about. Those of you who actually attend Lincoln Day dinners, and county party events, those of you who toil in the vineyards, spending time in communities, in diners, in barber shops, and in coffee shops where real, every day people can be found. You know it is real. You can see it and feel it.
This change comes in a tea bag!
Our comeback will not begin in Washington. Our conversation with America will not focus on Washington. Our Republican National Committee will no longer rely on Washington. We will look to the rest of America instead.
Finally, let me conclude today by talking for a minute about where the Republican Party is headed. For me the Republican Party owes its moorings to Edmund Burke, William F. Buckley, and Ronald Reagan. Those are the people that I trace my roots to in the Republican cause.
For each of them conservatism must always respect reality, effectively assess the times, and become relevant to them. Thus is our charge.
Ronald Reagan always insisted that our party must move aggressively to seize the moment. He insisted that our party recognize the truth of the times and establish our first principles in both word and deed.
As conservatives, we must stop acting like we don’t really believe in our principles. Too often, we act as if we are scared to apply our timeless principles to today’s problems and challenges.
Our path and our challenge are to apply our principles not to the past, but to the future.
In this hour conservatives stand just a bit stronger, just a bit wiser, ready once again to think and act with a freshness and a boldness that is uncompromising. For conservatism to take root in the next generation we must offer genuine solutions that are relevant to this age. A Republican Renaissance has begun!
We will conquer the challenges not of the last century, but the challenges of our time. Our success will not be found in dusting off old campaign manuals from the 70’s and 80’s. Our success will be found in speaking directly to the American people about a rebirth of the American Dream for this generation and generations to come.
We have been and must be once again the voice of the majority of Americans. It is up to us to expose the great Democrat fraud that is now being thrust upon this nation. Personal freedom, liberty, and a desire for self-governing are the timeless values that Americans hold dear.
In our Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote that there are certain inalienable rights, among them are the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Those rights are not conferred upon us by the federal government, but by a power greater than any government.
The Democrats act as if the government is the provider of the very liberties we enjoy. No fashionable politician or president, no matter how popular, can give them to us nor will we allow them to take them from us.
We will stand up for countless Americans who worry about their bills, are defenseless in the face of foreclosures. We are with them, because we are them. Now is the time to organize ourselves and to demand the limited government and freedom we deserve.
Over the coming months Republicans will be bold in our approach. We will offer real solutions, and we will do so aggressively and without apology. We will focus on freedom and the freedom of the individual.
Odds, as I told you before, don’t scare me. I am used to working against the odds imposed on us by critics, pundits and the otherwise clueless class. I know how to develop a team, implement a plan and deliver a victory. I am confident in this journey because I am taking it with you. I gain strength in this journey, because I gain it from you. Our Renaissance has begun. Our opportunities lie before us, and our cause is as true today as when we first began in 1854.
So in the best spirit of President Reagan, it’s time to saddle up and ride. Our country needs us. Thank you and may God bless you all. ####
Speech text courtesy of L.A.Times
It will be interesting to see if he can revitalize the GOP. It will be of even more interest to see if he can put a stop to all the petty infighting going on within the party and pull it back together again.
I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.
HONOLULU (AP) — Hawaii's state Senate overwhelmingly approved a bill Wednesday to celebrate "Islam Day" — over the objections of a few lawmakers who said they didn't want to honor a religion connected to Sept. 11, 2001.
The Senate's two Republicans argued that a minority of Islamic extremists have killed many innocents in terrorist attacks.
"I recall radical Islamists around the world cheering the horrors of 9/11. That is the day all civilized people of all religions should remember," said Republican Sen. Fred Hemmings to the applause of more than 100 people gathered in the Senate to oppose a separate issue — same-sex civil unions.
The resolution to proclaim Sept. 24, 2009, as Islam Day passed the Senate on a 22-3 vote. It had previously passed the House and now goes to Republican Gov. Linda Lingle.
The bill seeks to recognize "the rich religious, scientific, cultural and artistic contributions" that Islam and the Islamic world have made. It does not call for any spending or organized celebration of Islam Day.
"We are a state of tolerance. We understand that people have different beliefs," said Sen. Will Espero, a Democrat. "We may not all agree on every single item and issue out there, but to say and highlight the negativity of the Islamic people is an insult to the majority" of believers "who are good law-abiding citizens of the world."
But Republican Sen. Sam Slom argued that the United States has become too sympathetic toward Islamic extremists.
"I don't think there's any country in the history of the world that has been more tolerant than the United States of America, and because of that tolerance, we've looked the other way a lot of times, and many thousands of our citizens have been killed by terrorists," said Slom, a Republican.
The lone Democrat voting against the bill opposed it on church-state separation fears.
So? Where is the ACLU filing complaints regarding separation of church and state? Why is the state of Hawaii officially recognizing a specific religion? Wonder if we will hear from all the demonstrators that raise hell every time Christianity is mentioned in a government office? I don't imagine Madaline O'Hares ghost will come back for this issue of church and state?











From Yahoo News:
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is celebrating Cinco de Mayo a little early.
On the eve of the Mexican holiday, Obama on Monday had an event in the East Room of the White House with Mexico's Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan (sahr-oo-KHAN').
Obama joked that it was "Cinco de Cuatro," botching a play on the Spanish word for "four" when he meant to say "Cuatro de Mayo," or the Fourth of May. He tried again, but he still did not get it right.
Moving past the jumbled translation, the president assured his guests that the White House wants to be early in commemorating the holiday.
Cinco de Mayo celebrates the Mexican troops' defeat of the French on May 5, 1862, at Puebla. Obama called it a "decisive victory" that inspired a sense of pride that Mexicans feel today.
And this coming from a President that loudly proclaimed during his campaign:
SEN. BARACK OBAMA (D-IL), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Instead of worrying about whether immigrants can learn English, they will learn English. You need to make sure your child can speak Spanish."
He apparently could speak Spanish when the story shown below was released by the Washington Post back on the 28 May 2008:
Making use of relatively simple Spanish, but a very good accent, Barack Obama addresses the Democratic voters of Puerto Rico.
"Mensaje a Puerto Rico," or "Message to Puerto Rico" is a direct-to-camera appeal by Obama.
"Naci en una isla," he says, meaning "I was born on an island."
"Entiendo que la comida, la gasolina, y todo cuesta mas. Puerto Rico tiene derecho a un mejor futuro," Obama adds, meaning "I know that food, gas, and everything costs more. Puerto Rico has the right to a better future."
Later he states that, "Este primer de Junio, sera un honor contar con tu voto," meaning, "This first of June it would be an honor to have your vote."
"He's kind of always been around Latinos, and obviously heard some language," says Vincent Casillas, coordinator of Spanish media for the Obama campaign, who adds he only recent heard the senator's Spanish-speaking skills during a recent campaign stop in Miami. The ad has been well received in Puerto Rico, Casillas added, suggesting the senator may do similar ads in the coming months.
And of course all the comments regarding this story slammed then President Bush regarding his ability to speak Spanish (and English) while being from Texas and praised Obamas ability and fluency in Spanish.
Then he did another TV ad speaking in Spanish:
Super Typical -- the entire world is making fun of obama for saying "cinco de cuatro" without actually understanding the sophistication of a joke he was making:
It was "five minutes to four" when he was speaking... thats why he looked at his watch -- idiots... hope that shuts up those people who thought they were smarter than Obama!"
If you cannot trust this man to get his Spanish correct, can you really trust him with nukes? Clearly everything that comes out of his mouth is suspect. Ha ha, just wanted to beat the conservative nuts to their punchline. Happy fifth of fourth.
You get the idea.