Oh No, Another Conservative Blog
One mans perspective
OHNOANOTHERCONSERVATIVEBLOG.COM

Election Day and Voting

We have a primary election today in Georgia and we have been hearing the urgings of media, government officials, candidates, and community organizers of the importance to register and vote.

My opinion? If you are too freaking lazy, apathetic, or cynical to get out and vote?  Keep your butt at home. If a person can not be bothered to fill out a simple piece of paper, and lets face it, it has been made appallingly easy to register; then this person will not be bothered to acquaint themselves with the issues or even the fundamentals of how our system works.  Many citizens will spend more time in line at the local supermarket buying a case of beer than they will be willing to spend to vote.

The laws of our country have been amended many times just to ensure citizens can vote.  

•    (1870) Amendment 15. Voting Rights – Black Suffrage
•    (1913) Amendment 17. Direct Election of Senators
•    (1920) Amendment 19. Women’s Right to Vote
•    (1961) Amendment 23. Presidential Elections for the District of Columbia
•    (1964) Amendment 24. Poll Tax Ended
•    (1971) Amendment 26. Vote for Eighteen-Year-Olds

Registering to vote has never been easier. The government and civic organizations put forth an enormous amount of manpower and funding to ensure people are registered, to encourage them to vote and people still do not do so.  Personally, I am not going to cajole, push, plead, beg, or bribe anyone to acquaint themselves with the candidates and issues, get to their polling place and cast their ballot..  I would prefer to maintain the 30% of voters who do show up and are knowledgeable concerning the issues and candidates instead of a possible 100% of voters showing up and 70% of them not even knowing who the candidates are or what the issues are.

We have seen the results of an uninformed public being brought out to vote. Lazy or apathetic? Stay home and watch TV.

According to Daniel Webster, we should, "Impress upon children the truth that the exercise of the elective franchise is a social duty of as solemn a nature as man can be called to perform; that a man may not innocently trifle with his vote; that every elector is a trustee as well for others as himself and that every measure he supports has an important bearing on the interests of others as well as on his own."  This is a fairly serious legacy to live up to.





I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Curious Question on Universal Health Care


Have you ever wondered why the very same people who continue to believe the myth the government actually paid thousands of dollars apiece for nuts and bolts (the same ones purchased at Home Depot) and thousands of dollars on a toilet seat (the same type bought at WalMart) are comfortable with the notion the government can actually run a Universal Health Care program cost effectively?

Just curious.


I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

President Obama is Given the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009



The Norwegian Nobel Committee has announced its winner of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.  They unanimously gave the award to President Obama.  I say gave as he has yet to actually do anything in the world arena to merit this award other than spout a lot of rhetoric and campaign type speeches.

According to the official statement:

Announcement

The Norwegian Nobel Committee

The Nobel Peace Prize for 2009

The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded

to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy

and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision

of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.

Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy

has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other

international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for

resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from

nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to

Obama's initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great

climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.

Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and

given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those

who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the

majority of the world's population.

For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that

international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman.

The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that "Now is the time for all of us to take our share of

responsibility for a global response to global challenges."


Oslo, October 9, 2009

President Obama said Friday that he was "surprised and deeply humbled" by the decision of the Norwegian Nobel Committee to award him the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.

I bet he was surprised.  He is aware he has done nothing.  The committee is aware he has done nothing.  Even the news crews covering the event were surprised by the announcement as the names were submitted before Obama was even elected.  The finalists names were gathered in February.  He had certainly accomplished nothing by then.  I can only assume this is another example of supposedly reasonable people being blinded by his rhetoric and oratory skills (if he has a teleprompter).   In essence, President Obama is being given this award because of his VISION!  That is correct; he has a vision no one else has ever had or voiced; this alone apparently merits the Nobel Peace Prize.

This act of awarding Obama the prize doesn't come close to the outrage of awarding the prize to
Yasser Arafat, the PLO terrorist in 1994 (along with Israel's Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Foreign Minister Shimon Peres).  That award was given in recognition for a physical act: the Oslo Accords.  Of course, the treaty turned out to be a farce and there was no peace.  The award then, as now, was premature and unmerited.
 
This committee has lost any shred of  credibility and respect that I once had for them and my disgust with the committee knows no limits. 


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Gallbladder: One mans brief journey into the Army Medical system (part 1 of 2)


Years ago, Tony Bennett sang of leaving his heart in San Francisco.  Well, My tale of leaving my gallbladder at Winn Army Hospital in Fort Stewart, Georgia isn't romantic but it is of importance to me and its passing wasn't one of sorrow, sweet or otherwise.  As the surgeon had stated after the surgery it was totally blocked and "rotten".   I'm frankly glad it is gone.  Good riddance in my opinion.

This tale started towards the end of July when I was awakened from a sound sleep by stomach cramps.  I'm not talking about your "ate a couple of green apples" kind of cramps, I'm referring to the doubling over, "shove your arm down your throat, grab an organ of choice and toss it on the fire to exorcise the demons within" type of  abdominal cramps.  As it lasted only half an hour or so, it was relatively easy to pass it off as an occurrence of some kind; nothing dramatic.  After a couple more of these episodes it was starting to concern me, but no other symptoms were being displayed so I chalked it up to the recent purchase and consuming of those round chips in a can which coincidently had proceeded each of these events.  I quit eating them.  Then I had another incident followed a couple days later by the granddaddy of them.  By the time the cramping had gone on for six hours, I got cleaned up, dressed and went into the emergency room with my wife.

I checked in and was promptly shown to the triage desk where my vital signs were taken.   A few minutes later I was in a cubicle and the show started.  Within four hours I had blood samples taken, a urine sample taken, a CT scan performed, an ultrasound performed, had an EKG taken, been put on an IV with various drugs within, been issued drugs to take home, and tentatively diagnosed with gallbladder disease. In each of these steps I was treated with courtesy, respect and caring by a various member of the ER or radiology staff.  Each of these persons explained what they were doing and why and performed their duties in a professional manner while still giving me every impression they cared what they were doing and cared about me. In addition, there was a shift change shortly after my arrival.  Frankly I was impressed.

I was seen the next morning by my Primary Care Provider.  I arrived at the clinic 15 minutes earlier and was promptly escorted to the station where my vital signs were taken.  At the time of my appointment I was called and escorted to another cubicle where I soon met my Doctor for the first time.  She went over everything, performed an exam of her own and apparently agreeing with the diagnosis made an appointment with the surgeon for me.  Again, everyone was super polite, efficient, professional, and friendly.  I was given an appointment for the following week with my surgeon to discuss options and procedures.

During the time spent waiting for this appointment I did as much research as I could on this puny little organ with the capability to wreck such havoc and just what my options were.  The subject came up among my friends and on-line friends to which the general consensus was to "go civilian".  Most of these friends had never served in the military instead relying on horror stories passed on quite apparently.  Now, I have had military medical care my entire life; growing up in the military and spending a career in the Army myself and had always been rather pleased with the care I or my family had received.

The day of my appointment arrived and again I showed up 15 minutes early only to be told shortly thereafter the surgeon had been called away to an emergency surgery.  The staff was up front with us and asked if anyone wanted to be rescheduled or if we would prefer to wait.  They kept us informed every few minutes as to the surgeons status.  When I was finally called into the surgeons office, he advised me of the findings, his conclusions and his recommendations as well as the options available.  He ensured I understood everything and answered all the questions I had as well as apologizing for being called away.  His staff set me up with a pre-op appointment and the surgery date. 
Everyone in this department also, was super polite, efficient, professional, and friendly.  I had a warm and fuzzy feeling about everything when I left.

Over the next few days, the situation deteriorated.  The pain became constant from the time I was awake to the time I went to sleep.  The only way I was even able to sleep was due to the medications the ER had prescribed.  However, I was running out of them and no way would the meds last until my surgery.  So, with ten days to go before my surgery I called my surgeons staff and asked to speak to the surgeon about renewing the prescription.  He called back rather surprised I was taking the medicine or even needed to.  When I explained the situation he stated he would call me right back.  Within minutes he called back stating I was to fast after midnight and be in the next morning for my pre-op and surgery was scheduled for the following morning after the pre-op.

I reported to the pre-op desk the next morning to be greeted by a very friendly staff who started by having me fill out a minimum number of forms after which I was placed in a waiting room for a few minutes until I was called by the first of my appointments.  She briefed me was to what was going to occur and had me sign a few more papers.  My next appointment was with a pretty, young private who took some blood samples and performed an EKG about as smoothly and painlessly as I have ever had done.  That was followed by an interview with an incredibly friendly and outgoing anesthesiologist who asked me a gang of questions, briefed me as to the procedures which were to be used and checked me out for suitability for the laryngoscope.   She also asked if I had allergies.  The next step was to get a chest X-ray which was obtained in a matter of minutes.  I was frankly amazed at the speed and efficiency in which the x-ray was taken.  The last step was to check in with the inpatient section, I believe (although the name may be wrong). I read a few documents and signed signifying my understanding.  I read the sign on the wall stating the charges regarding various medical plans.  Contrary to popular belief, I as a military retiree do not have free medical care, which is in fact what I had been promised my entire career, particularly around re-enlistment time.  I have medical and dental premiums that I need to pay if I want any medical care; again, contrary to all promises made to me and other retirees in the past.  Again; everyone was friendly, polite, professional and caring.   I was reminded during the course of this pre-op that I was to consume no food, drink, nor tobacco after midnight.

I could see the next morning was not going to get started on the right foot at all as far as my comfort went.  But, after the dealings I had with each and every member of the staff I dealt with, I was left with no doubt in my retired military mind that I would receive excellent care while I was there.

(end of part 1)





    

         


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

The Obama Bible cover




When I first saw this, my first thought was an interesting photo-shop job and a funny one at that.  Well, it is real and for sale for a mere $19.99.  Just the thing for the well dressed liberal heading off to church.



courtesy Neal Boortz

I'm afraid I find it more than a little creepy, and taken in context-perhaps just a little blasphemous.






I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Honduras: When is a coup not a coup?



The Obama administration has condemned the removal of Honduran president Manuel Zelaya as illegal and referred to it as a coup. The administration is in good company;  Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Ecuador’s Rafael Correa, Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega, Cuban dictator Raúl Castro,  Rafael Correa in Ecuador, Evo Morales in Bolivia, and Álvaro Uribe in Colombia all agree with the Obama administration.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehiten (R-FL), ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee stated that Zelaya was “moving to re-write the Honduran constitution to extend and expand his power, while retaliating against those who stand in the way.”

On June 28 the  Honduran attorney general charged Zelaya with deliberately violating Honduran law and the Supreme Court ordered his arrest in Tegucigalpa.  President Zelaya had attempted to hold a referendum (or poll) to establish a National Constituent Assembly, with a mandate to write a completely new constitution. The Supreme Court of Honduras, Congress, the country's attorney general, and the supreme electoral tribunal opposed the poll and in fact the Congress (to include his own party) began discussing impeachment proceedings.  The Supreme Court ordered the head of the Honduran military staff General Vásquez not to distribute the poll materials required for the referendum at which time the President fired him.  The Honduran Supreme Court ruled the firing of General Vásquez unconstitutional.  President Zelaya went ahead with his plans which culminated in his arrest by the military.


This placed the President in violation of three articles of the Honduran constitution; Article 4 which provides that any 'infraction' of the succession rules constitutes treason", Article 205, which says the legislature has the authority to decide whether charges can be brought against the president, to approve or disapprove of the administrative conduct of the executive branch, and to name a special commission to investigate matters of national interest.and Article 239 of the Constitution, which states that “whomever changes or attempts to change” Article 4 relating to the form of government and the limits of presidential terms, “will be immediately removed from public office”. Therefore, on June 25, Zelaya was no longer the President of Honduras, per ruling of the Supreme Court on June 26.  The authority for his arrest was in accordance with Article 272 of the Honduran Constitution which states, “The Honduran Armed Forces are a National Institution of permanent nature, essentially professional, non-political, obedient, and non-deliberating. They are constituted to defend the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Republic, keep the peace, public order, and Constitutional Rule, the principles of free suffrage, and the alternability in the exercise of the Presidency of the Republic". 

Many elements of the media have called it a military coup, apparently not bothering to conduct any research or acknowledging the fact the Honduran military immediately turned power over to
head of Congress Roberto Micheletti, the next in line following the President.  The Honduran military whisked him out of the country, to Costa Rica, when it executed the court's order, which was itself apparently a violation of the constitution.  The "new" government stated they did so to avoid bloodshed. 

New elections are planned for 29th November 2009.

President Zelaya has had a few problems in the past regarding his countries constitution.  According to the Wall Street Journal:

"Besides eagerly trampling the constitution, Mr. Zelaya had demonstrated that he was ready to employ the violent tactics of chavismo to hang onto power. The decision to pack him off immediately was taken in the interest of protecting both constitutional order and human life.

Two incidents earlier this year make the case. The first occurred in January when the country was preparing to name a new 15-seat Supreme Court, as it does every seven years. An independent board made up of members of civil society had nominated 45 candidates. From that list, Congress was to choose the new judges.

Mr. Zelaya had his own nominees in mind, including the wife of a minister, and their names were not on the list. So he set about to pressure the legislature. On the day of the vote he militarized the area around the Congress and press reports say a group of the president's men, including the minister of defense, went to the Congress uninvited to turn up the heat. The head of the legislature had to call security to have the defense minister removed.

In the end Congress held its ground and Mr. Zelaya retreated. But the message had been sent: The president was willing to use force against other institutions.

In May there was an equally scary threat to peace issued by the Zelaya camp as the president illegally pushed for a plebiscite on rewriting the constitution. Since the executive branch is not permitted to call for such a vote, the attorney general had announced that he intended to enforce the law against Mr. Zelaya.  A week later some 100 agitators, wielding machetes, descended on the attorney general's office. "We have come to defend this country's second founding," the group's leader reportedly said. "If we are denied it, we will resort to national insurrection."

These experiences frightened Hondurans because they strongly suggested that Mr. Zelaya, who had already aligned himself with Mr. Chávez, was now emulating the Venezuelan's power-grab. Other Chávez protégés -- in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua -- have done the same, refusing to accept checks on their power, making use of mobs and seeking to undermine institutions."

As regards the referendum or poll?  According to a story carried by Europapress:

Several computers containing the results of the referendum Zelaya wanted to conduct are seized at the Presidential Palace.  The National Directors of Criminal Investigation seized various computers from the Presidential Palace that had recorded the supposed results of the referendum to reform the constitution that the deposed leader, Manuel Zelaya, was planning to conduct on July (sic) 28, the day he was removed from office.

The official investigation now deals with the possible crime of fraud and falsification of documents due to the fact that some of the certified voting results had been filled with the personal information of individuals that supposedly participated in the failed referendum that did not take place because of the coup.

One of the district attorneys that participated in the operation that took place this Friday showed reporters an official voting result from the Technical Institute Luis Bogran, of Tegucigalpa, in which the specific number of people that participated in table 345, where there were 550 ballots, 450 of which were votes in favor of Zelaya's proposal and 30 were against, in addition to 20 blank ballots and 30 ballots, which were nullified.
The seizure took place on the third floor of the building attached to the Ministry of the Presidency that had been rented to the ex-minister of the Interior, Enrique Flores Lanza. The deputy district attorney, Roberto Ramirez, declared this area as a "crime scene" and, although he did not want to provide further details, said that further evidence had been found that could be categorized as crimes of fraud, embezzlement of funds, falsification of documents, and abuse of authority.

Sounds as if President Zelaya had some members of ACORN as election consultants.





I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

The Fourth of July



Why do we celebrate the 4th of July?

Here are two reasons:

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual,uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records,for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise;the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners;refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations,which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence.They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America,in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War,conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.


— John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

courtesy of US History.org

and:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The remainder of the US Constitution can be read at US Constitution.net along with the amendments.  It is well worth reading in these trying political times.

How is our Constitutional Republic safeguarded?



and



Have a safe and happy Fourth of July!




I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Sarah Palin resigns as Alaskan Governor


According to a news story carried by KTUU.com, Alaskan Governor Palin will resign her position as Alaskan Governor this month.

WASILLA, Alaska -- In a stunning announcement, Gov. Sarah Palin said Friday morning she will resign her office in a few weeks.

Speculation has swirled for weeks, perhaps months that Palin would not seek re-election in 2010 as she pursues a political career on the national stage. The former vice presidential candidate has long been rumored to be considering a run at the Republican presidential nomination in 2012.

Palin did not address those rumors at the press conference at her Wasilla home, during which she did not take questions from reporters.

Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell will be inaugurated as her successor at the Governor's Picnic at Pioneer Park in Fairbanks on Sunday, July 26, Palin said.

Parnell said he will seek election to the governor's office in 2010. Parnell ran for Congress unsuccessfully against Rep. Don Young in the Republican primary last year.

Palin made the announcement flanked by Parnell and all of her cabinet. She said that recent incidents brought up by national media and the spate of ethics complaints have been taking away from her mission to serve Alaska.

She felt that it would be best to step aside and let Parnell and her cabinet continue. Palin said she discussed the decision with her family, and they were united in their support of her decision to step down.

In a story carried by the Washington Post as Palin aide stated the first term Governor is stepping down "so that she can take the fight for her issues elsewhere.".  This makes a lot of sense as the logistics of running a Presidential campaign as a seated Governor are..... impractical at best.  Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts are already in campaign mode.  Pawlenty announced his decision not to run for a third term as Governor this week in order to devote his time to the Presidential campaign while Romney is already retired.

Being located in Alaska presents many problems while running.  They are four hours behind East Coast time zone and almost an entire days travel time to get to any campaign destination.  This makes any campaign stop a minimum two day trip any from her duties.

Palin will need the next few years to build a cohesive campaign machine.  She will need to be visible to people around the nation as well as GOP strategists.  Palin will need to firmly establish herself as a Conservative, not as someone running on a very liberal Republican candidates ticket; this is an image that will have to be corrected.

Governor Palin has a long hard road ahead of her given the medias attitude and "open season" approach to covering her in the news.  She has to attempt to undue the damage left over from the McCain campaign committee and their sniping attacks on her throughout the campaign. And apparently continues as John Weaver, a longtime friend and confidant of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) comments, "We've seen a lot of nutty behavior from governors and Republican leaders in the last three months, but this one is at the top of that."

She has easily established her credentials as a viable political candidate.  Let us hope this starts her bid for President of the United States.

By the way, Governor Palin has a campaign PAC now at SarahPac

UPDATE:

12:00pm AKST - Update from Governor Palin: We'll soon attach info on decision to not seek re-election... this is in Alaska's best interest, my family's happy... it is good, stay tuned.

Hi Alaska, I appreciate speaking directly TO you, the people I serve, as your Governor.

People who know me know that besides faith and family, nothing's more important to me than our beloved Alaska. Serving her people is the greatest honor I could imagine.

I want Alaskans to grasp what can be in store for our state. We were purchased as a territory because a member of President Abe Lincoln's cabinet, William Seward, providentially saw in this great land, vast riches, beauty, strategic placement on the globe, and opportunity. He boldly looked "North to the Future". But he endured such ridicule and mocking for his vision for Alaska, remember the adversaries scoffed, calling this "Seward's Folly". Seward withstood such disdain as he chose the uncomfortable, unconventional, but RIGHT path to secure Alaska, so Alaska could help secure the United States.

People who know me know that besides faith and family, nothing's more important to me than our beloved Alaska.

Alaska's mission - to contribute to America. We're strategic IN the world as the air crossroads OF the world, as a gatekeeper of the continent. Bold visionaries knew this - Alaska would be part of America's great destiny.

Our destiny to be reached by responsibly developing our natural resources. This land, blessed with clean air, water, wildlife, minerals, AND oil and gas. It's energy! God gave us energy.

So to serve the state is a humbling responsibility, because I know in my soul that Alaska is of such import, for America's security, in our very volatile world. And you know me by now, I promised even four years ago to show MY independence... no more conventional "politics as usual".

And we are doing well! My administration's accomplishments speak for themselves. We work tirelessly for Alaskans.

We aggressively and responsibly develop our resources because they were created to be used to better our world... to HELP people... and we protect the environment and Alaskans (the resource owners) foremost with our policies.

Here's some of the things we've done:

We created a petroleum integrity office to oversee safe development. We held the line FOR Alaskans on Point Thomson - and finally for the first time in decades - they're drilling for oil and gas.

We have AGIA, the gasoline project - a massive bi-partisan victory (the vote was 58 to 1!) - also succeeding as intended - protecting Alaskans as our clean natural gas will flow to energize us, and America, through a competitive, pro-private sector project. This is the largest private sector energy project, ever. THIS is energy independence.

And ACES - another bipartisan effort - is working as intended and industry is publicly acknowledging its success. Our new oil and gas "clear and equitable formula" is so Alaskans will no longer be taken advantage of. ACES incentives NEW exploration and development and JOBS that were previously not going to happen with a monopolized North Slope oil basin.

We cleaned up previously accepted unethical actions; we ushered in bi-partisan Ethics Reform.

We also slowed the rate of government growth, we worked with the Legislature to save billions of dollars for the future, and I made no lobbyist friends with my hundreds of millions of dollars in budget vetoes... but living beyond our means today is irresponsible for tomorrow.

We took government out of the dairy business and put it back into private-sector hands - where it should be.

We provided unprecedented support for education initiatives, and with the right leadership, finally filled long-vacant public safety positions. We built a sub-Cabinet on Climate Change and took heat from Outside special interests for our biologically-sound wildlife management for abundance.

We broke ground on the new prison.

And we made common sense conservative choices to eliminate personal luxuries like the jet, the chef, the junkets... the entourage.

And the Lt. Governor and I said "no" to our pay raises. So much success in this first term - and with this success I am proud to take credit... for hiring the right people! Our goal was to achieve a gasoline project, more fair oil and gas valuation, and ethics reform in four years. We did it in two. It's because of the people... good public servants surrounding the Governor's office, with servants' hearts and astounding work ethic... THEY are Alaska's success!

We are doing well! I wish you'd hear MORE from the media of your state's progress and how we tackle Outside interests - daily - SPECIAL interests that would stymie our state. Even those debt-ridden stimulus dollars that would force the heavy hand of federal government into our communities with an "all-knowing attitude" - I have taken the slings and arrows with that unpopular move to veto because I know being right is better than being popular. Some of those dollars would harm Alaska and harm America - I resisted those dollars because of the obscene national debt we're forcing our children to pay, because of today's Big Government spending; it's immoral and doesn't even make economic sense!

Another accomplishment - our Law Department protected states' rights - TWO huge U.S. Supreme Court reversals came down against that liberal Ninth Circuit, deciding in OUR state's favor over the last two weeks. We're protectors of our Constitution - federalists protect states' rights as mandated in 10th amendment.

But you don't hear much of the good stuff in the press anymore, do you?

Some say things changed for me on August 29th last year - the day John McCain tapped me to be his running-mate - I say others changed.

Let me speak to that for a minute.

Political operatives descended on Alaska last August, digging for dirt. The ethics law I championed became their weapon of choice. Over the past nine months I've been accused of all sorts of frivolous ethics violations - such as holding a fish in a photograph, wearing a jacket with a logo on it, and answering reporters' questions.

Every one - all 15 of the ethics complaints have been dismissed. We've won! But it hasn't been cheap - the State has wasted THOUSANDS of hours of YOUR time and shelled out some two million of YOUR dollars to respond to "opposition research" - that's money NOT going to fund teachers or troopers - or safer roads. And this political absurdity, the "politics of personal destruction" ... Todd and I are looking at more than half a million dollars in legal bills in order to set the record straight. And what about the people who offer up these silly accusations? It doesn't cost them a dime so they're not going to stop draining public resources - spending other peoples' money in their game.

It's pretty insane - my staff and I spend most of our day dealing with THIS instead of progressing our state now. I know I promised no more "politics as usual," but THIS isn't what anyone had in mind for ALASKA.

If I have learned one thing: LIFE is about choices!

And one chooses how to react to circumstances. You can choose to engage in things that tear down, or build up. I choose to work very hard on a path for fruitfulness and productivity. I choose NOT to tear down and waste precious time; but to build UP this state and our country, and her industrious, generous, patriotic, free people!

Life is too short to compromise time and resources... it may be tempting and more comfortable to just keep your head down, plod along, and appease those who demand: "Sit down and shut up", but that's the worthless, easy path; that's a quitter's way out. And a problem in our country today is apathy. It would be apathetic to just hunker down and "go with the flow".

Nah, only dead fish "go with the flow".

No. Productive, fulfilled people determine where to put their efforts, choosing to wisely utilize precious time... to BUILD UP.

And there is such a need to BUILD up and FIGHT for our state and our country. I choose to FIGHT for it! And I'll work hard for others who still believe in free enterprise and smaller government; strong national security for our country and support for our troops; energy independence; and for those who will protect freedom and equality and LIFE... I'll work for and campaign for those PROUD to be American, and those who are INSPIRED by our ideals and won't deride them.

I WILL support others who seek to serve, in or out of office, for the RIGHT reasons, and I don't care what party they're in or no party at all. Inside Alaska - or Outside Alaska.

But I won't do it from the Governor's desk.

I've never believed that I, nor anyone else, needs a title to do this - to make a difference... to HELP people. So I choose, for my State and my family, more "freedom" to progress, all the way around... so that Alaska may progress... I will not seek re-election as Governor.

And so as I thought about this announcement that I wouldn't run for re-election and what it means for Alaska, I thought about how much fun some governors have as lame ducks... travel around the state, to the Lower 48 (maybe), overseas on international trade - as so many politicians do. And then I thought - that's what's wrong - many just accept that lame duck status, hit the road, draw the paycheck, and "milk it". I'm not putting Alaska through that - I promised efficiencies and effectiveness! ? That's not how I am wired. I am not wired to operate under the same old "politics as usual." I promised that four years ago - and I meant it.

It's not what is best for Alaska.

I am determined to take the right path for Alaska even though it is unconventional and not so comfortable.

With this announcement that I am not seeking re-election... I've determined it's best to transfer the authority of governor to Lieutenant Governor Parnell; and I am willing to do so, so that this administration - with its positive agenda, its accomplishments, and its successful road to an incredible future - can continue without interruption and with great administrative and legislative success.

My choice is to take a stand and effect change - not hit our heads against the wall and watch valuable state time and money, millions of your dollars, go down the drain in this new environment. Rather, we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time, on another scale, and actually make a difference for our priorities - and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans.

Let me go back to a comfortable analogy for me - sports... basketball. I use it because you're naive if you don't see the national full-court press picking away right now: A good point guard drives through a full court press, protecting the ball, keeping her eye on the basket... and she knows exactly when to pass the ball so that the team can WIN. And I'm doing that - keeping our eye on the ball that represents sound priorities - smaller government, energy independence, national security, freedom! And I know when it's time to pass the ball - for victory.

I have given my reasons candidly and truthfully... and my last day won't be for another few weeks so the transition will be very smooth. In fact, we will look to swear Sean in - in Fairbanks at the conclusion of our Governor's picnics.

I do not want to disappoint anyone with my decision; all I can ask is that you TRUST me with this decision - but it's no more "politics as usual".

Some Alaskans don't mind wasting public dollars and state time. I do. I cannot stand here as your Governor and allow millions upon millions of our dollars go to waste just so I can hold the title of Governor. And my children won't allow it either. ? Some will question the timing. ? Let's just say, this decision has been in the works for awhile...

In fact, this decision comes after much consideration, and finally polling the most important people in my life - my children (where the count was unanimous... well, in response to asking: "Want me to make a positive difference and fight for ALL our children's future from OUTSIDE the Governor's office?" It was four "yes's" and one "hell yeah!" The "hell yeah" sealed it - and someday I'll talk about the details of that... I think much of it had to do with the kids seeing their baby brother Trig mocked by some pretty mean-spirited adults recently.) Um, by the way, sure wish folks could ever, ever understand that we ALL could learn so much from someone like Trig - I know he needs me, but I need him even more... what a child can offer to set priorities RIGHT - that time is precious... the world needs more "Trigs", not fewer.

My decision was also fortified during this most recent trip to Kosovo and Landstuhl, to visit our wounded soldiers overseas, those who sacrifice themselves in war for OUR freedom and security... we can ALL learn from our selfless Troops... they're bold, they don't give up, they take a stand and know that LIFE is short so they choose to NOT waste time. They choose to be productive and to serve something greater than SELF... and to build up their families, their states, our country. These Troops and their important missions - those are truly the worthy causes in this world and should be the public priority with time and resources and NOT this local / superficial wasteful political bloodsport.

May we ALL learn from them!

*((Gotta put First Things First))*

First things first: as Governor, I love my job and I love Alaska. It hurts to make this choice but I am doing what's best for Alaska. I've explained why... though I think of the saying on my parents' refrigerator that says "Don't explain: your friends don't need it and your enemies won't believe you anyway."

But I have given my reasons... no more "politics as usual" and I am taking my fight for what's right - for Alaska - in a new direction.

Now, despite this, I don't want any Alaskan dissuaded from entering politics after seeing this REAL "climate change" that began in August... no, we NEED hardworking, average Americans fighting for what's right! And I will support you because we need YOU and YOU can effect change, and I can too on the outside.

We need those who will respect our Constitution where government's supposed to serve from the BOTTOM UP, not move toward this TOP DOWN big government take-over... but rather, will be protectors of individual rights - who also have enough common sense to acknowledge when conditions have drastically changed and are willing to call an audible and pass the ball when it's time so the team can win! And that is what I'm doing!

Remember Alaska... America is now, more than ever, looking North to the Future. It'll be good. So God bless you, and from me and my family - to ALL Alaska - you have my heart.

And we will be in the capable hands of our Lieutenant Governor, Sean Parnell. And Lieutenant General Craig Campbell will assume the role of Lieutenant Governor. And it is my promise to you that I will always be standing by, ready to assist. We have a good, positive agenda for Alaska.

In the words of General MacArthur said, "We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction."



I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES)


The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES) (Waxman-Markey bill) was approved by the House of Representatives on June 26, 2009 by a vote of 219-212, but has not yet been approved by the Senate.  This bill would establish a variant of a cap-and-trade plan for greenhouse gases to address climate change.

To view the bill in its entirety go to the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and attempt to read all 1200 pages of the bill.  I'm fairly confident our Representatives have not.  Let us hope our Senators read it and fail to pass it.

The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that the legislation would increase revenue by $873 billion from 2010 through 2019 and would increase direct spending by $864 billion during that time. It also said that several mandates would “well exceed” the annual guidelines set in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

The bill itself was subject to many amendments prior to passage.  By close of business on May 20, 2009, 2 Republican and 24 Democratic amendments had been adopted. 15 Republican amendments had been defeated. No amendment sponsored by a Democrat had yet been defeated.  No surprise there.

The US Chamber of Commerce is against passage of the bill.  Their analysis of the bill is fascinating reading, although a little lengthy.  One passage I found particularly interesting was, "Coal and petroleum sectors are hit very, very hard by this bill.
  In the case of coal, the industry receives $60 billion through 2025 for funding of R&D for carbon capture and sequestration. However, the absence of this technology in early years under the cap means that fuelswitching will almost certainly occur and coal will be de-selected from the marketplace. New coal plants permitted between 2009 and 2015 must retrofit to CCS within five years or lose federal assistance. New coal plants permitted between 2015 and 2020 must use CCS at commencement of operations or else will lose federal assistance. All coal plants permitted after 2020 must use CCS. Of course, all of this assumes a coal plant will easily obtain a permit and be built at any time in the near future
."  I assume their use of the word "deselected" means it is going away.  Readers will remember the then candidate Obamas campaign promise made prior to the election in which he stated; "

...I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year.

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted...

I would say off hand President Obamas intentions are fairly clear on this bill as well as the other bills he has pushed through. 

William Kovacs, senior vice president of environment, technology and regulatory affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the bill would harm business: "The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, a 1,200-page behemoth consisting of a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gas emissions, a federal renewable electricity mandate, and a suite of new mandatory energy efficiency standards, will impose 397 new federal regulations (which require traditional federal agency rulemakings) and 1060 new mandates on an American public already overwhelmed by extensive federal regulation." (boldface is mine)

With the new mandates and new regulations being imposed, does anyone seriously believe our energy costs and resulting product costs will not go much higher? Perhaps more than the average lower middle class and working poor family will be able to afford?  For example:  American Farm Bureau economists estimate permit costs for cattle and cash-crop acreage could skyrocket under the new proposed regulations.  Agricultural operations primarily emit methane from rice and animal agriculture operations, and nitrous oxide from fertilizer applications and animals. The potency of these two gases is greater than carbon dioxide; thus CAA regulation would affect even small to mid-size farms according to  Missouri Farm bureau officials.  This will result in higher meat prices for a start.  The same principal works in other manufacturing, merchandising, and construction arenas of business.

According to Washington Watch dot com passage of this bill will cost the average person in the USA $3,885, average couple $7,770, the average household will pay $9,985 and the average family will end up paying $12,161. 

In the second paragraph I referenced $873 billion.  Any idea where that amount of money comes from?  You might recall the words of Rep. John Dingell (D-MI), the former head of the Energy & Commerce committee, who said in April:  "Nobody in this country realizes that cap and trade is a tax, and it's a great big one."  Another Democrat who recognizes this bill for what it really is?  W&M Chairman Charlie Rangel:  "Whether you call it a tax, everyone agrees that it's going to increase the cost to the consumer.  At the end of the day ... if there's nothing there to repay [consumers] for their financial expenditures, it might be difficult to fight Republicans who call this a tax."


Will we really get hit with higher energy costs?  Why not ask Obama to say in his own words?


xx




I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

North Korea threatens to nuke Hawaii


Due to reduced tax bases, many communities will forego their traditional 4th of July fireworks celebrations, but if North Korea's Kim Jong Il follows through successfully on his threat, Hawaii will not be one of them.  On 18 June, Kim Jong Il threatened to fire a Taepodong-2, long-range missile tipped with a nuclear warhead at Hawaii according to Yomiuri Daily, Japan's most popular newspaper.

North Korea conducted a nuclear test on May 25 and may be looking to launch a long-range missile toward Hawaii after the United Nations punished Pyongyang by toughening sanctions. The U.N. Security Council responded by toughening an arms embargo, authorizing ship searches for nuclear and ballistic missile cargo and depriving the regime of the financing used to build its nuclear program.  The U.S. Navy is tracking a North Korean ship under the new sanctions that bar Pyongyang from trading in weapons, including missile parts and nuclear material.  According to Fox News, "the USS John McCain, a Navy destroyer, is positioning itself in case it gets orders to intercept the ship Kang Nam as soon as it leaves the vicinity off the coast of China, according to a senior U.S. defense official".

Shortly after the tests, President Obama declared North Korea a "grave threat" to the world, and pledged that recent U.N. sanctions on the communist regime will be aggressively enforced.  This prompted  Kim Jong Il  to warn a "thousand-fold" military retaliation against the U.S. and its allies if provoked.  "If the U.S. and its followers infringe upon our republic's sovereignty even a bit, our military and people will launch a one hundred- or one thousand-fold retaliation with merciless military strike," the government-run Minju Joson newspaper said in a commentary according to Fox news.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he has ordered the U.S. military to take defensive measures should North Korea attempt to fire a ballistic missile toward Hawaii.    

Gates stated on Thursday the military is "watching" that situation "very closely," and would have "some concerns" if North Korea launched a missile in the direction of Hawaii. But he expressed confidence in U.S. ability to handle such a launch.  Gates said he's directed the deployment of the Theater High Altitude Area Defense, a mobile missile defense system used for knocking down long- and medium-range missiles. 

"The ground-based interceptors are clearly in a position to take action. So, without telegraphing what we will do, I would just say ... I think we are in a good position, should it become necessary, to protect the American territory."

On Wednesday, a military radar system — shaped like a giant golf ball — slowly disappeared from Hawaii's coast as it headed out to sea. The 28-story missile X-Band defense radar is designed to work with ground-based missile interceptors on the island of Kauai to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles during their final phase of flight.  The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system was returned to Hawaii after the mobile launcher recently was tested at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

Since 2005, all six tests of the ground-based missile system have intercepted their targets, excluding tests when the targets malfunctioned, Missile Defense Agency spokeswoman Pam Rogers said.

This will be a superb opportunity to see our missile defense program, of which President Obama cut over $1 billion from the budget, the day after North Korea fired its missile.  

It is doubtful if the missile which has a range of 4,000 miles (6,500 kilometers), could hit the main islands of Hawaii which is 4,500 miles (7,200 kilometers) from North Korea.  But, the firing of the missile is a direct affront to the UN sanctions and the United States.

According to intelligence analysts,  North Korea's missiles could strike the U.S. within three years if its weapons growth goes unchecked, but this does not mean they lack the capability at this moment.

However, The independent International Crisis Group said the North is believed to have between 2,500 and 5,000 tons of chemical weapons, including mustard gas, phosgene, blood agents and sarin. These weapons can be delivered with ballistic missiles and long-range artillery and are "sufficient to inflict massive civilian casualties on South Korea."  South Korea's annual defense report, published early this year, said that in addition to chemical weapons, the North is believed to be capable of producing biological weapons with agents like anthrax and smallpox.

The logical portion of my brain tells me this is merely more posturizing on the part of the diminutive little North Korean dictator.  The logical side of my brain believes this is an attempt to make himself look big to his people.  Some analysts believe that the North's rhetoric is aimed at showing people at home that their government can defy the powerful U.S., and giving credit for it to Kim's reported heir apparent, Kim Jong Un. The analysts say this would make Jong Un's ascent to the top acceptable to the North Koreans.  Now, does this rhetoric still work out well for him if he doesn't actually fire the missile?  Or if it self destructs on the launch pad creating a nuclear blast seen from outer space?  Or if, like the last launch the missile falls into the ocean 40 seconds into flight? 

However, there is also that part of my brain that tells me the world has seen many "mad as hatter" nutjob dictators that come to believe their own hype and propaganda and have led their countries to total destruction.  Is North Korea soon to be added to the list?  Assuming President Obama takes any action....... other than a strongly worded letter of protest.



I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Trust on Issues




Interesting polling results per the Rasmussan Reports:       
                                 
Voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on six out of 10 key issues, including the top issue of the economy.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 45% now trust the GOP more to handle economic issues, while 39% trust Democrats more.

This is the first time in over two years of polling that the GOP has held the advantage on this issue. The parties were close in May, with the Democrats holding a modest 44% to 43% edge. The latest survey was taken just after General Motors announced it was going into bankruptcy as part of a deal brokered by the Obama administration that gives the government majority ownership of the failing automaker.

Voters not affiliated with either party now trust the GOP more to handle economic issues by a two-to-one margin.  Separate Rasmussen tracking shows that the economy remains the top issue among voters in terms of importance.

Republicans also now hold a six-point lead on the issue of government ethics and corruption, the second most important issue to all voters and the top issue among unaffiliated voters. That shows a large shift from May, when Democrats held an 11-point lead on the issue.

For the eighth straight month, Republicans lead on national security. The GOP now holds a 51% to 36% lead on the issue, up from a seven-point lead in May. They also lead on the war in Iraq 45% to 37%, after leading by just two points in May and trailing the Democrats in April.

Fewer voters see national security as a very important issue this month, but confidence that the United States and its allies are winning the War on Terror is at its highest level since February.

Republicans lead the Democrats on immigration for the third straight month, pulling ahead to a 35% to 29% advantage on the issue.

On taxes, the GOP leads the Democrats for the fifth straight month, 44% to 39%. In May and April, Republicans held six-point leads on the issue.

Democrats continue to hold the lead on the issues of health care, Social Security and education. While Democrats have a 10-point advantage on health care, that’s down from the 18-point lead the party had a month ago.  Democrats lead by six points on Social Security, down from nine points in May. The parties were tied on the issue in April.  On education, Democrats hold a 44% to 37% lead over Republicans.

The parties are tied on the issue of abortion for the second straight month, each earning 41% support from voters.

Link for Rasmussan Reports:  http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues/trust_on_issues




I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.






 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Surprise! Obama considers taxing the wealthy



Health care.  President Obama has asked for legislation to be enacted before August of this year.   To this end, there have been several proposals put forth.  In essence they all require-yes, require; under penalty of law, that all Americans carry medical coverage.  The key proposal involves a Federally operated exchange, although states could offer an exchange for citizens use also.  Senator Kennedys' proposal is gaining steam.  His scheme requires employers to supply health care for ALL workers; part-time workers included.  Another cost to be passed on to the consumers of course.  

The interesting aspect to this entire mandatory health care is we are talking about 17% of the working population.  The Democrats estimate there are about 46 million uninsured citizens in the country of a population of over 300 million.  So, our entire health care infrastructure and insurance industry will be overhauled and remade;  more taxes will be levied-for the 17% of our population without health care.  This is a tough subject as almost everyone has an anecdote involving themselves or someone close who has had financial difficulties due to medical problems.  But, principals are involved here as well as the question of just how much government involvement do we as a nation want in our daily lives and how much independence do we want from our governments.  Do we want  entrepreneurs to flourish in this nation or do we desire government run businesses?  I mean, more so than now.

I'm not going into detail on the specific health care schemes at present as so much of it is up in the air right now.  The one aspect any of the plans have is the enormous cost involved and the increased bureaucracy that will be created to manage this beast.  Any bets on how the Obama administration is proposing to pay for his universal health care?  

According to a story carried by Bloomberg.com,   President Obama wants Congress to consider taxing the wealthy instead of workers to pay for a health-care overhaul, as House Democrats discuss a plan to require health insurance for most Americans. In an interesting twist, he isn't calling for increased tax rates; he is instead going for the traditional Obama obfuscation.   Instead of raising the tax rate, his proposal is to reduce the number of  deductions.  According to Bloomberg, "Obama’s own proposal would set a 28 percent cap on tax deductions for items such as mortgage interest, investment expenses and charitable gifts for Americans in the two highest tax brackets, which would be 36 percent and 39.6 percent under his proposals. Without the cap, they would be able to deduct 36 cents and 39.6 cents on the dollar for those expenses, respectively.  Obama also proposes new taxes on securities dealers and life insurers, and to raise revenue by prohibiting certain estate-planning techniques."  The story goes on further for other ways to raise revenue, "Lawmakers have a plethora of proposals to raise the hundreds of billions estimated to be needed for an overhaul, including new taxes on soda, beer, and wine, and a partial tax on employer-provided health insurance for the first time".  Nothing like discouraging citizens from planning ahead and taking care of their estates.  

Can anyone explain why the Democrats believe all moneys earned by Americans belong to the government and is only "loaned" to the citizens?  Why does the Democrat party insist on confiscating wealth from those that have earned it and "leveling the financial playing field" by giving it to those that have not earned it.  Why do we as a nation, continue to punish those that have succeeded and reward those that have not been as successful?  Why have the Democrats not been able to figure out the simple little rule that business and corporations pay no taxes, expenses, fines, etc.  They are all passed on to the consumer.  The question that looms in my mind, is what happens when the cost can no longer be passed on to the consumer before the product or service being sold is higher than the consumer wants or is able to pay?  What happens to the entrepreneur or stockholders then?  And the employees, landlords, supporting businesses........ and of course the tax money.  

Within the story is the comment, "The tax-free nature of employer-provided insurance is the biggest tax expenditure in the federal budget."  Here again is a reference to the government "LOSING" money as if somehow a business or citizen somehow manages to keep some money through various deductions, exemptions, tax breaks/credits, or some other "nefarious" means of keeping money from the rightful owners; the government.  Obama adviser David Axelrod, speaking for the article is going to rectify this problem saying there is a Senate proposal to tax some employer-provided health benefits.  Apparently, if an employer is already providing health benefits they could now face paying taxes on those benefits.  Obama is trying to avoid taking that step at present.

Another interesting comment in the article is one made by Axelrod.  “We have to bring down the cost of health care,” he said. “If we do that and make it affordable, people are going to buy it, mandate or no mandate.”  This point is referenced quite a few times.  Bring down the costs.  How is this going to be done?  Is the government going to do to doctors as they did to CEOs of the bailout businesses and place a cap on their salaries?  Will he pay their student loans?  Place a cap on prescription medicines? Will they also place a cap on lawsuits and caps on malpractice insurance rates?  Are they going to place a cap on the cost of hospitalization so it will be as cheap to stay there as a Motel 6?  The plan would place new restrictions on private insurers, including a bar on excluding coverage for those with “pre- existing conditions.” That is going to lower costs?  How?  The Centers for Disease Control has estimated that the annual health care costs for an individual with diabetes are approximately $13,000. Will the insurer have to charge government mandated lower rates and suck up the remaining amount of a confirmed loss? Or has Obama, et al discovered a miracle cure for diseases like diabetes, heart disease, and cancer that will automatically result in lower costs?  The point is almost all of these examples are of private businesses and corporations-not charities or government run institutions.  Yet.






I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.





 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

IRS wants tax preparers to be licensed and regulated



If IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman has his way there will soon be another layer of government added to an already bloated IRS by regulating and licensing all tax preparers.  He says that this will help reduce mistakes and combat fraud.  Shulman goes on to say, "Paying taxes is one of the largest financial transactions individual Americans have each year, and we need to make sure that professionals who serve them are ethical and ensure the right amount of tax is paid."  Apparently the private sector is incapable of providing this service with integrity so government intervention is mandated.

According to a story carried on Breitbart.com, "From 2006 through 2008, the IRS initiated more than 600 investigations of fraud among tax preparers. During that time, 356 tax preparers were convicted, with more than 80 percent of them sentenced to prison, home confinement or electronic monitoring."  This breaks down to about 200 investigations a year, with a little over a 50% conviction rate.  This merits sweeping reforms and such drastic changes?

The government is apparently now tacitly admitting the taxes are so cumbersome and difficult to manage, anyone doing so requires special training and licensing in order to do it effectively.  Eighty percent of taxpayers get help with their returns, either from paid preparers or computer programs, Shulman told a congressional subcommittee.  A more practical solution would perhaps be to simplify the tax code and the filing process through the passage of the Fair Tax, Flat Tax, or a national sales tax.

The expenses involved in this program will of course be high, but think of the infrastructure which will pop up to support the licensing scheme.  Study materials for the test, license "camps", testing centers, storage of results and managing the databases will all of course have to be provided by someone.  The new bureaucracy will need to update the standards every year, publish these standards, create the tests and disseminate them to the testing centers prior to the start of the tax year.  They will have to get these results back to the licensing authority for issuance to the tax preparers before the tax year.  I doubt they can do it.

Who pays for this?  The taxpayer of course.  We will pay the governments portion through a higher budget for the IRS and pay the tax preparers portion through higher rates.  As they will be tested and licensed, tax preparers will now be able to ask for even higher rates in addition to passing along the costs associated with testing and licensing.  If taxpayers wanted to pay the rates we would probably see , they would pay for a CPA to do their taxes.  At this point, nothing has been said about individuals preparing their own taxes, but under the current administration, can anyone doubt it will show up on the table for discussion?  I wonder how this will affect on-line or tax applications (such as Turbo Tax)?

Who would write the new standards and tests for licensing?  The very agency who has trouble answering questions about their own tax forms; the IRS.  Even they don't trust their documents as evidenced by the extract from The Internal Revenue Manual   4.10.7.2.8  (01-01-2006) IRS Publications:  IRS Publications explain the law in plain language for taxpayers and their advisers. They typically highlight changes in the law, provide examples illustrating Service positions, and include worksheets. Publications are nonbinding on the Service and do not necessarily cover all positions for a given issue. While a good source of general information, publications should not be cited to sustain a position.  Unfortunately, the IRS is not bound by answers or positions stated by its employees orally, whether in person or by telephone.  According to the procedural regulations, 'oral advice is advisory only and the IRS is not bound to recognize it in the examination of the taxpayer's return.'

According to a story carried by the AP  IRS Workers Mistaken Almost Half the Time (September 3, 2003), "IRS centers established to help people prepare their tax returns gave incorrect answers - or no answer at all - to 43 percent of the questions asked by Treasury Department investigators posing as taxpayers.  Auditors were given correct answers to 57 percent of their tax law questions during the course of the study. Less than half, or 45 percent, of the questions were answered correctly and completely. In 12 percent of the cases, the answer was correct but incomplete.  The IRS disputed the results. Using the raw numbers gathered by Treasury investigators, the IRS recalculated the error rate and ignored any instance when a taxpayer was denied service or told to do his own research. Of the questions answered, they calculated that 67 percent were answered accurately. The IRS hopes to improve its track record and answer 80 percent of the questions correctly this year, and 85 percent correctly next year."  An accuracy rate of 67% and hoping for an accuracy rate of 85%?  And the IRS is to write the standards and tests for tax preparers?  Will the IRS reps have to qualify?  






I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Philadelphia voter intimidation case dropped by Justice Department appointees



"My teachers, my colleagues and my friends" is how Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr described Justice Department career attorneys.  He further described them as the "backbone" of the department.  "If I am confirmed as attorney general, I will listen to them, respect them and make them proud of the vital goals we will pursue together," he said during his January confirmation hearings.

Apparently not quite so much if the events that transpired earlier this week within the Justice Department are any indication.  

Political appointees within the Justice Department overruled the career attorneys that had been working since the election on charges of  voter intimidation by three members of the New Black Panthers at a Philadelphia polling place.  The career Justice lawyers were on the verge of securing sanctions against the men earlier this month when their political appointed superiors ordered them to reverse course, according to interviews and documents. The court had already entered a default judgment against the men on April 20.

A little background.

Longtime readers of my blog will remember a story carried on 6 November "Random Thoughts on the Election" in which I mentioned voter intimidation by these Black Panthers.

The civil suit filed Jan. 7 identified the three men, New Black Panther Chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz, Minister King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson, as members of the Panthers and said they wore military-style uniforms, black berets, combat boots, battle-dress pants, black jackets with military-style insignias and were armed with "a dangerous weapon"and used racial slurs and insults to scare would-be voters and those there to assist them at the Philadelphia polling location on Nov. 4.  Malik Zulu Shabazz is a Washington, D.C., resident, not a Philadelphian.   Mr. Jackson was an elected member of Philadelphia's 14th Ward Democratic Committee, and was credentialed to be at the polling place last Nov. 4 as an official Democratic Party polling observer, according to the Philadelphia City Commissioner's Office.  Although I'm not convinced his elected position entitled him to wear a pseudo-military uniform or carry a nightstick.  


According to the complaint, Malik Zulu Shabazz, a Howard University Law School graduate, said the placement of King Samir Shabazz and Mr. Jackson in Philadelphia was part of a nationwide effort to deploy New Black Panther Party members at polling locations on Election Day.

According to  The Washington Times,

To support its evidence, the government had secured an affidavit from Bartle Bull, a longtime civil rights activist and former aide to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign. Mr. Bull said in a sworn statement dated April 7 that he was serving in November as a credentialed poll watcher in Philadelphia when he saw the three uniformed Panthers confront and intimidate voters with a nightstick.

"In my opinion, the men created an intimidating presence at the entrance to a poll," he declared. "In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi ... I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location."

Mr. Bull said the "clear purpose" of what the Panthers were doing was to "intimidate voters with whom they did not agree." He also said he overheard one of the men tell a white poll watcher: "You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

He called their conduct an "outrageous affront to American democracy and the rights of voters to participate in an election without fear." He said it was a "racially motivated effort to limit both poll watchers aiding voters, as well as voters with whom the men did not agree."

A Justice Department spokesman on Thursday confirmed that the agency had dropped the case, dismissing two of the men from the lawsuit with no penalty and winning an order against the third man that simply prohibits him from bringing a weapon to a polling place in future elections.

Bringing weapons to a polling place?  I was always under the impression that was illegal to start with.  I wasn't aware it took a court order to state that rather obvious fact.

Even with Mr. Bulls sworn affidavit and the video tape (below), the current administration and their political appointed attorneys in the Justice Department apparently feel there were no laws violated or civil liberties violated.

 

I'm hoping these actions were taken without Attorney General Holders knowledge or approval and I'm further hoping President Obama realizes there has been a mistake made and either he or AG Holder backtrack, reopen this case and bring it to it's correct legal conclusion.

In September 2007 President Obama made a speech in which he stated:

“The teenagers and college students who left their homes to march in the streets of Birmingham and Montgomery; the mothers who walked instead of taking the bus after a long day of doing somebody else's laundry and cleaning somebody else's kitchen — they didn't brave fire hoses and Billy clubs so that their grandchildren and their great-grandchildren would still wonder at the beginning of the 21st century whether their vote would be counted; whether their civil rights would be protected by their government; whether justice would be equal and opportunity would be theirs. . . . We have more work to do.”

— Barack Obama, Speech at Howard University, September 28, 2007

Do his words hold true for all Americans or not?




I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Memorial Day


Memorial Day-the holiday observed by Americans to remember..... and honor those who have given their lives in military service to their country.  

As we traditionally use this day to unofficially celebrate the start of Summer by grilling and going to the beach, let us take a few minutes at 3 pm and remember why we have this day of observance and remember the sacrifices these young men and women have made.


courtesy of Digger History

In Flanders Fields
By: Lieutenant Colonel John McCrae, MD (1872-1918)
Canadian Army

In Flanders Fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields. 

courtesy of  Arlington Cemetery         

President Obama has made his Memorial Day speech.  I am including it as he is the Commander in Chief, but I wish he cared enough to actually learn just what the purpose of Memorial Day was and he had addressed the actual holiday.
     
 




I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Michael Steele, chairman of the Republican National Committee




Michael Steele, the new chairman of the Republican National Committee, gave a speech to a gathering of the GOP in Maryland today and gave a rather impressive talk concerning the future of the Republican party.  The only thing missing was concrete examples of where the GOP is going.  But, rather than play a talking head and tell you what he said, I will print the speech for your pleasure.

***********************

Once again, welcome to Maryland. Welcome to Prince George’s County, Maryland. This is my birthplace, the place where I raised my family and the place of my first leadership position in the Republican Party. 

It was a tough job – and the pay wasn’t very good. Most of my time was spent walking neighborhoods, licking envelopes, and making phone calls for the County Republican Party.

You don’t know lonely until you announce: “Hi, I’m from the Prince George’s County Republican Party.”

But, I learned a great deal; and it served as a foundation on my journey to becoming....

...County Chairman, State Chairman and the first African American elected statewide.You are in the place where this incredible journey began; a place that is very special to me.

Many of you may know this story, so forgive me for re-telling it, but it speaks to who I am and why I am particularly honored that you have chosen me to serve as your chairman.

I was born about 20 minutes from here at Andrews Air Force Base and raised in our nation’s capital. I was adopted by my mother and father, a father who suffered from his addictions and his temper and who died when I was 4 years old.

So, my mother Maebell raised me on the salary of laundry worker, having earned no more than $3.83/hour on the day she retired. But, she had managed by her perseverance and the help of her new husband, John, to send me to parochial school, John Carroll High School, and Johns Hopkins University. I would go on to attend Georgetown University Law School while my sister Monica would become the doctor in the family.

So, I think I know something about confronting the odds.

In 2002, I was approached by then-Congressman Bob Ehrlich to run with him as his Lt. Governor. It was an uphill battle. No Republican had won the governorship of Maryland since Spiro Agnew. More importantly, we ran against Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, the daughter of Robert F. Kennedy and Uncle Teddy’s little niece. We ran an unconventional campaign that wooed a number of Democrats to our side. We built coalitions and met with a diverse community of civic, religious and political leaders in their neighborhoods and places of worship.

On election night when the votes were counted, we made history becoming the first winning Republican ticket in 40 years and beating back the status quo thinking that it could not be done.

So, I know little something about winning against the odds.

I wanted to begin with that reflection to create the context for what comes next:  Lessons learned; lessons that have shaped me as your chairman and that will shape us as a party.

We are at a crucial juncture for our party, and more importantly for our country. Simply put, America needs us now more than ever before. It’s time to rise to the occasion. It’s time to make our voices heard. It’s time to serve our country as the loyal opposition.

We all realize that the Democrats want us to be silent. They want to diminish our voice, and they even want to try to suggest that by being the loyal opposition we are in some way being less than patriotic.  You’ve heard the suggestion that if we oppose the president’s policies we are in some crazy way rooting against American success.

But we also know nothing could be further from the truth. The fact is, we would be abandoning our responsibility if we were to be silent while they spend our country into the abyss, while they borrow money we don’t have, and while they usher in the most massive expansion of federal government control in the history of our Republic.

Well, I’ve got news for them. We aren’t going to be silent. We are going to speak up, and we are going to show that we have the courage of our convictions. We will not be afraid to agree with the president when we believe he is doing what is best for America, but neither will we be afraid to disagree with the president when we believe his actions are hurting our country.

So, today I’m going to talk to you about some very important turning points for our party.

The first turning point is this: Today we are declaring an end to the era of Republicans looking backward.

We have just endured two successive elections where we were soundly defeated. As a result, many of us, me included, have done some soul searching.  We have looked closely at the places we went wrong, we have talked openly and publicly about our mistakes and our deficiencies.

If you don’t learn from the past, you are of course destined to repeat it. This has been a difficult, yet healthy and necessary task for our party.

People are sick of politicians and political parties who never own up to their mistakes. We have done so.  We lost our way on spending and we owned up to that.  We came to Washington to change it and in some ways we let Washington change us, and we owned up to that.  We’ve taken some important steps to recover our values and our senses, and we can say we see the world with a clearer head and a sharper vision.

The era of apologizing for Republican mistakes of the past is now officially over. It is done. The time for trying to fix or focus on the past has ended. The era of Republican navel gazing is over.  We have turned the corner on regret, recrimination, self-pity and self-doubt. Now is the hour to focus all of our energies on winning the future.

The Republican Party is again going to emerge as the party of new ideas. It will take some time, for sure, but it is beginning now. Our governors are emerging with fresh answers to old problems. Some of our brightest stars in Congress are emerging with new approaches.  New groups and new entities are being formed. Republicans are rising once again with the energy, the focus, and the determination to turn our timeless principles into new solutions for the future.

The introspection is now over. The corner has been turned.

The second turning point for our party is this: We are going to take the president head-on.  The honeymoon is over. The two-party system is making a comeback, and that comeback starts today.

The Democrats are in power. They wanted it and now we are going to make them own the results of their arrogance of power: Policies that are hurting the long-term health of our country. We are going to give voice to the growing chorus of Americans who realize that there is a difference between creating wealth and redistributing wealth. And we are not going to be shy about it. Simply put, we are going to speak truth to power.

There has been a great deal of talk in Republican circles about how we should deal withPresident Obama and the entire Obama phenomenon. Many have suggested that we need to be careful, that we need to tip-toe around President Obama, that we have to be careful not to take him on, at least not directly.

This has led to some hand-wringing among Republicans; and quite frankly some missed opportunities. 

We’ve seen strategists writing memos and doing briefings urging that Republicans avoid confronting the President.  Steer clear of any frontal assaults on his Administration, they warn.

They suggest that instead we should go after Nancy Pelosi, whom nobody likes. 

Or Harry Reid, whom nobody knows. 

Or this Tim Geithner fellow, whom nobody believes.

Or maybe even Barney Frank, whom nobody understands.

You know the thinking. In the same way that the Democrats target conservative talk show hosts and former vice presidents, we should also engage in some misdirection, just like they do.

The argument goes that we should be careful here, because the polls suggest that President Obama is popular.

Well, the president is personally popular. Pity the fool who paid for a poll to figure that out. Folks like him.  He’s got an easy demeanor. He’s a great orator. His campaign was based on change and hope. He’s young.  He’s cool. He’s hip. He’s got a good looking family. What’s not to like? He’s got all the qualities America likes in a celebrity, so, of course he is popular.

There’s only one problem. He’s taking us in the wrong direction and bankrupting our country. Were it not for that little detail, I’d be a big fan too.

This popular politician who is our president is engaged in the most massive expansion of the old industrial age model of government that our country has ever seen. This popular politician is spending America into debt of such mammoth proportions that none of us can even begin to calculate it or really understand it.  The numbers are so big that they seem impossible.

If we have the courage of our convictions, and we do, then we will and we must stand against these disastrous policies, regardless of the president’s personal popularity.  This is not a game, this is not a popularity contest, and this is not American Idol.  This is the future of our country that is at stake.

The guy who campaigned in favor of bottom-up style of governing is presiding over the most massive top down expansion of government bureaucracy and spending our country has ever seen or even contemplated.

Candidate Obama was very moderate in his views, but President Obama could not possibly be further to the far left.

Candidate Obama talked about fiscal responsibility, about government living within its means. But President Obama is saddling our unborn grandchildren with mountains of debt.

Candidate Obama boasted about cutting taxes, but President Obama will have to raise taxes to pay for his massive top-down government explosion.

Candidate Obama was all about being bipartisan, but President Obama could not be more partisan, yielding his legislative agenda almost entirely to radicals like Nancy Pelosi.

So…what’s the loyal opposition to do with this popular president?  We are going to speak truth to power. We are going to speak directly, and we are going to take him on. 

This is not about personalities. This is about the very sizeable gap emerging between America’s opinion of President Obama the man, and America’s opinion of President Obama’s policies. In fact, it’s not a gap, it’s a chasm.

In the end we are all about ideals, principles, policies, and ideas. We have only one goal, and it’s not power.It’s not majorities. It’s success for America.

The honeymoon is over. We are going to challenge those policies that we believe are wrong, and we are going to do so without apology and without a second thought.

But there is a very important distinction I want to make here.

We are going to take this president on with class. We are going to take this president on with dignity.  This will be a very sharp and marked contrast to the shabby and classless way that the Democrats and the far left spoke of President Bush.

We’ve just seen a bunch of news stories on President Obama’s first 100 days in office. Predictably, most in the media were fawning all over the president.

But I wouldn’t break ground on the Mall for his monument just yet, as his policies are increasingly unpopular with the American people.

The American people aren’t worried about polls. The American people are worried about jobs, foreclosures, bailouts, taxes, spending, and debt. While the Obama Administration is giving the banks a stress test, they are also giving the American people a tremendous amount of stress.

Let’s look at the first 100 days of President Obama’s “reign of error” in a factual manner, not in terms of his speeches, but in terms of his actions:

•           Under President Obama the federal government is now in the banking business.

•           Under President Obama the government now makes cars.

•           Under President Obama our country has amassed debts that will take generations to repay.

•           Under President Obama America is increasingly in debt to foreign countries, from China to the Middle East.

•           President Obama now wants to cap and tax every single American into paying higher utility rates.

•           President Obama and his allies in Congress have now put their taxing eyes on soft drinks.

•           President Obama and Democrat leaders want a brand new tax on our health care benefits and are devising a plan to give federal government bureaucrats control of our health care system.

•           President Obama is backing a plan to take away the basic right of every American worker to cast a private ballot.

•           President Obama has for the first time in our history politicized the US Census process by putting political appointees in his White House in charge of it and wanting a corrupt, fraudulent organization to run it.

•           President Obama and his far left allies are flirting with an attempt to squelch the basic freedom of speech of our nation’s airwaves.

•           President Obama’s Attorney General is trying to use Mexican drug gang wars as a reason to advocate a new gun ban in America.

•           President Obama’s Administration has disparaged our war heroes and veterans by suggesting that they are a threat to our safety, when the truth is they are the cause of our safety.

•           The president, who thinks that every student should be able to go to college, is cutting much needed funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities.

•           The president, who pledged that he would create millions of jobs through federal public works projects, now requires project labor agreements on such projects which effectively denies small and minority owned businesses access to those jobs because they are not unionized.

•           And the one the galls me the most:  While the president sends his kids to a private school, he is at the very same time taking away opportunity scholarships from poor Hispanic and African-American kids right here in our nation’s capital.

Those are the facts of the president’s first 100 days.

The last Democrat President declared that the era of big government was over. Can some please send President Obama a copy of that memo! Because this new Democrat President has ushered in a new era of left wing, old school, top down, Industrial Age, bureaucratic Big Government the likes of which our country has never seen.

It is all designed for short-term political pay-off, with potentially catastrophic long-term effects on our nation’s economic prosperity.

Our nation’s unemployment rate has climbed to a 25 year high. The gross domestic product, the best indicator of our economic health, was down 6.1 percent in the last quarter.

Two and half million Americans have lost their jobs this year alone.  Just last month, when 530,000 Americans lost their jobs, this Administration tried to spin this as progress.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama are planning an America where there are more people moving down the ladder of opportunity than moving up the ladder of opportunity. They are planning for an America that is more dependent, less industrious and less ambitious than our nation’s ideals.

That is not the kind of America Republicans envision.

As the next 100 days unfold, the president and the Democrat Party would be wise to remember these timeless truths:

“You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.”

“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.”

“You cannot help the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.”

“You cannot further the brotherhood of man by encouraging class hatred.”

“You cannot establish security by borrowing money.”

“You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.”

“You cannot build character and courage by taking away one’s initiative and incentive.”

“You cannot help individuals permanently by doing for them what they should do for themselves.”

The honeymoon is over. It’s time to speak truth to power.

The third turning point is this: The Republican comeback has begun. It is underway, and it is not in Washington.

I may not know much, but I do know that our comeback is well underway in states all across America. 

I’ve had the opportunity to meet with all of you in five regional roundtables in each part of the country. We did those meetings behind the scenes, out of the public eye. That gave us a great opportunity to speak candidly with each other, a chance to review our strategies and tactics, a chance to learn from each other, and a chance to be very direct with each other.

I’ve also had the honor of speaking in 23 different states in the past 100 days. From Oregon to Idaho, from Wisconsin to Indiana, from Florida to Georgia, the energy among the grassroots is strong.

Too bad the chattering classes inside the Beltway are too busy fretting over phony disputes and intra-party intrigue to notice that a change has indeed come to America. But it’s not the one the Obama Administration wants aired on the nightly news.

Those of you who live outside of Washington know what I’m talking about. Those of you who actually attend Lincoln Day dinners, and county party events, those of you who toil in the vineyards, spending time in communities, in diners, in barber shops, and in coffee shops where real, every day people can be found.  You know it is real. You can see it and feel it.

This change comes in a tea bag!

Our comeback will not begin in Washington. Our conversation with America will not focus on Washington. Our Republican National Committee will no longer rely on Washington.  We will look to the rest of America instead.

Finally, let me conclude today by talking for a minute about where the Republican Party is headed. For me the Republican Party owes its moorings to Edmund Burke, William F. Buckley, and Ronald ReaganThose are the people that I trace my roots to in the Republican cause.

For each of them conservatism must always respect reality, effectively assess the times, and become relevant to them. Thus is our charge.

Ronald Reagan always insisted that our party must move aggressively to seize the moment. He insisted that our party recognize the truth of the times and establish our first principles in both word and deed.

As conservatives, we must stop acting like we don’t really believe in our principles. Too often, we act as if we are scared to apply our timeless principles to today’s problems and challenges.

Our path and our challenge are to apply our principles not to the past, but to the future.

In this hour conservatives stand just a bit stronger, just a bit wiser, ready once again to think and act with a freshness and a boldness that is uncompromising.  For conservatism to take root in the next generation we must offer genuine solutions that are relevant to this age. A Republican Renaissance has begun!

We will conquer the challenges not of the last century, but the challenges of our time. Our success will not be found in dusting off old campaign manuals from the 70’s and 80’s. Our success will be found in speaking directly to the American people about a rebirth of the American Dream for this generation and generations to come.

We have been and must be once again the voice of the majority of Americans. It is up to us to expose the great Democrat fraud that is now being thrust upon this nation. Personal freedom, liberty, and a desire for self-governing are the timeless values that Americans hold dear.

In our Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote that there are certain inalienable rights, among them are the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  Those rights are not conferred upon us by the federal government, but by a power greater than any government.

The Democrats act as if the government is the provider of the very liberties we enjoy.  No fashionable politician or president, no matter how popular, can give them to us nor will we allow them to take them from us.

We will stand up for countless Americans who worry about their bills, are defenseless in the face of foreclosures. We are with them, because we are them. Now is the time to organize ourselves and to demand the limited government and freedom we deserve.

Over the coming months Republicans will be bold in our approach.  We will offer real solutions, and we will do so aggressively and without apology.  We will focus on freedom and the freedom of the individual.

Odds, as I told you before, don’t scare me. I am used to working against the odds imposed on us by critics, pundits and the otherwise clueless class. I know how to develop a team, implement a plan and deliver a victory. I am confident in this journey because I am taking it with you. I gain strength in this journey, because I gain it from you.  Our Renaissance has begun.  Our opportunities lie before us, and our cause is as true today as when we first began in 1854.

So in the best spirit of President Reagan, it’s time to saddle up and ride. Our country needs us. Thank you and may God bless you all.    ####

Speech text courtesy of  L.A.Times 

It will be interesting to see if  he can revitalize the GOP.  It will be of even more interest to see if he can put a stop to all the petty infighting going on within the party and pull it back together again.



I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Hawaii lawmakers back the creation of 'Islam Day'



File this one under the title, "What in the world are they thinking?".

HONOLULU (AP) — Hawaii's state Senate overwhelmingly approved a bill Wednesday to celebrate "Islam Day" — over the objections of a few lawmakers who said they didn't want to honor a religion connected to Sept. 11, 2001.

The Senate's two Republicans argued that a minority of Islamic extremists have killed many innocents in terrorist attacks.

"I recall radical Islamists around the world cheering the horrors of 9/11. That is the day all civilized people of all religions should remember," said Republican Sen. Fred Hemmings to the applause of more than 100 people gathered in the Senate to oppose a separate issue — same-sex civil unions.

The resolution to proclaim Sept. 24, 2009, as Islam Day passed the Senate on a 22-3 vote. It had previously passed the House and now goes to Republican Gov. Linda Lingle.

The bill seeks to recognize "the rich religious, scientific, cultural and artistic contributions" that Islam and the Islamic world have made. It does not call for any spending or organized celebration of Islam Day.

"We are a state of tolerance. We understand that people have different beliefs," said Sen. Will Espero, a Democrat. "We may not all agree on every single item and issue out there, but to say and highlight the negativity of the Islamic people is an insult to the majority" of believers "who are good law-abiding citizens of the world."

But Republican Sen. Sam Slom argued that the United States has become too sympathetic toward Islamic extremists.
"I don't think there's any country in the history of the world that has been more tolerant than the United States of America, and because of that tolerance, we've looked the other way a lot of times, and many thousands of our citizens have been killed by terrorists," said Slom, a Republican.

The lone Democrat voting against the bill opposed it on church-state separation fears.

So?  Where is the ACLU filing complaints regarding separation of church and state?  Why is the state of Hawaii officially recognizing a specific religion?  Wonder if we will hear from all the demonstrators that raise hell every time Christianity is mentioned in a government office?  I don't imagine Madaline O'Hares ghost will come back for this issue of church and state?  

The lone Democrat had it right on this issue and the two Republicans got it wrong.  They opposed passage, but for the wrong reasons.  22 Democrats apparently have no clue.  Wonder if they will consider passage of a National Christianity Day?  Judaism? 

Eh, don't hold your breath waiting for it.

Update:

Here is a copy of HCR100-HD1

HOUSE CONCURRENT
RESOLUTION
PROCLAIMING SEPTEMBER 24, 2009, AS ISLAM DAY.
1 WHEREAS, Hawaii is known for the wealth of its cultural and
2 religious diversity and the harmony with which people of many
3 cultures and religions live together; and
4
5 WHEREAS, Muslims constitute an ethnically diverse part of
6 Hawaii's cultural fabric, with around 3,000 practicing members;
7 and
8
9 WHEREAS, the Prophet Mohammad left his house to migrate to
10 Madinah and reached Quba in the vicinity of Madinah on the 12th
11 day of Rabi ul-Awwal according to the lunar calendar, or
12 September 24th according to the Gregorian calendar, thereby
13 marking the birth of Islam; and
14
15 WHEREAS, Islam, a religion with a long and noble history,
16 is the second largest religion in the world, with over one
17 billion followers spread across every continent, and including
18 members of many nations and cultures; and
19
20 WHEREAS, the Islamic world preserved and made original
21 contributions to works of science and philosophy during the
22 Middle Ages when these disciplines were threatened by bigotry
23 and prejudice in other parts of the world; and
24
25 WHEREAS, Islamic artists, scientists, and philosophers have
26 a rich history of contribution to world literature and our
27 collective scientific understanding; and
28
29 WHEREAS, the Islamic faith shares common teachings found in
30 the texts of both Christianity and Judaism, whose followers are
31 respected and considered "People of the Book"; and
HCR100 HD1 HMS 2009-3797
II~~IIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~~I~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1~1~11111111111~~~lllllllllllllllllllllmlll
Page 2 H.C.R. NO. 100
H.D.1
1 WHEREAS, Islamic doctrine encourages generosity in its
2 adherents, maintaining that those who possess much have a
3 responsibility to care for those in need; and
4
5 WHEREAS, Islam, along with its monotheistic counterparts,
6 holds that peace is a divine quality and necessary for
7 collective human happiness; and
8
9 WHEREAS, Islam strives for a world-wide community which, in
10 the words of one Islamic poet philosopher, "does not recognize
11 the superficial differences of race, or history, or
12 nationality"; and
13
14 WHEREAS, the United States and countries of the Islamic
15 world hold in common many beliefs and values including concepts
16 of world community and'mutual responsibility; and
17
18 WHEREAS, international understanding and peace, as well as
19 understanding and peace in our local communities, are
20 strengthened by free and open communications among everyone
21 representing various cultural and religious traditions; and
22
23 WHEREAS, the 96th United States Congress officially
M recognized the noble qualities of Islam in a concurrent
25 resolution on October 15, 1979 (SCR 43), honoring the religion's
26 14th centennial; now, therefore,
27
28 BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the
29 Twenty-fifth Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session
30 of 2009, the Senate concurring, that September 24, 2009, shall
31 be known as "Islam Day" to recognize the rich religious,
32 scientific, cultural, and artistic contributions Islam and the
33 Islamic world have made since their founding; and
34
35 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this
36 Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to Hawaii's congressional
37 delegation, the Governor, and the Board of the Muslim
~ Association of Hawaii.

Recent figures place the Muslim population of Hawaii at around 3,000 of a total population of 1,283,388.  What accounts for this astounding move on the part of the Hawaiian legislature?







I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.



 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Halo to the chief


While doing background on a unrelated story, I came across this photo:



This photo was found on the Marietta Daily Journal website.

What caught my eye was the ubiquitous halo effect over the Presidents head.  Later in the evening I was talking with my neighbor and I told her about this halo image continuing to show up in various photographs of the President.  She stated she had not noticed this.

For my neighbor, I offer the following images.



Obama by moonlight halo.



Time magazine gets into the act



The classic Obama halo



Some photographers have to work it to make the image



With others, it comes easier



Some have to -really- work at it



The contemplative halo effect, always a popular one



Sometimes he photographer just has to use what is available



And the awesome "star" halo.

And even Michelle gets into the act:



Any remaining doubts?






I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

President Obama celebrates "Cinco de Cuatro"



WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is celebrating Cinco de Mayo a little early.

On the eve of the Mexican holiday, Obama on Monday had an event in the East Room of the White House with Mexico's Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan (sahr-oo-KHAN').

Obama joked that it was "Cinco de Cuatro," botching a play on the Spanish word for "four" when he meant to say "Cuatro de Mayo," or the Fourth of May. He tried again, but he still did not get it right.

Moving past the jumbled translation, the president assured his guests that the White House wants to be early in commemorating the holiday.

Cinco de Mayo celebrates the Mexican troops' defeat of the French on May 5, 1862, at Puebla. Obama called it a "decisive victory" that inspired a sense of pride that Mexicans feel today.

And this coming from a President that loudly proclaimed during his campaign:  

SEN. BARACK OBAMA (D-IL), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Instead of worrying about whether immigrants can learn English, they will learn English. You need to make sure your child can speak Spanish."

He apparently could speak Spanish when the story shown below was released by the Washington Post back on the 28 May 2008:

Making use of relatively simple Spanish, but a very good accent, Barack Obama addresses the Democratic voters of Puerto Rico.

"Mensaje a Puerto Rico," or "Message to Puerto Rico" is a direct-to-camera appeal by Obama.

"Naci en una isla," he says, meaning "I was born on an island."

"Entiendo que la comida, la gasolina, y todo cuesta mas. Puerto Rico tiene derecho a un mejor futuro," Obama adds, meaning "I know that food, gas, and everything costs more. Puerto Rico has the right to a better future."

Later he states that, "Este primer de Junio, sera un honor contar con tu voto," meaning, "This first of June it would be an honor to have your vote."

"He's kind of always been around Latinos, and obviously heard some language," says Vincent Casillas, coordinator of Spanish media for the Obama campaign, who adds he only recent heard the senator's Spanish-speaking skills during a recent campaign stop in Miami. The ad has been well received in Puerto Rico, Casillas added, suggesting the senator may do similar ads in the coming months.

And of course all the comments regarding this story slammed then President Bush regarding his ability to speak Spanish (and English) while being from Texas and praised Obamas ability and fluency in Spanish.

Then he did another TV ad speaking in Spanish:

 

It is quite apparent President Obama can speak Spanish, he just has one hell of a terrible time once you remove him from his teleprompter umbilical cord.

The interesting aspect to this story and my point to the thread is the spin placed on it by the various news services and readers who comment on the story.   When President Bush erred while speaking Spanish, he was held up to ridicule and mocked.  Obama again gets a bye on any and all gaffes.  For example, the Yahoo story passing over the gaffe with the glib comment "Moving past the jumbled translation...".  LA Times? "...in a well-intentioned attempt at Spanish and a joke about being a day early, Obama said:  "Bienvenidos. Welcome to Cinco de Cuatro -- (laughter) -- Cinco de Mayo at the White House. "  Washington Post?  Never mentioned.  In fact the quip was omitted.  "Yesterday, on what was technically Cuatro de Mayo, President Obama invited Mexican Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan and other Latino dignitaries to the White House to get the party started early."We are a day early, but we always like to get a head start here at the Obama White House. . . . But even as we mark this joyous and festive occasion, we do so mindful of the fact that this is a difficult time for Mexico," Obama said." 

Comments from readers: 

Super Typical -- the entire world is making fun of obama for saying "cinco de cuatro" without actually understanding the sophistication of a joke he was making:
It was "five minutes to four" when he was speaking... thats why he looked at his watch -- idiots... hope that shuts up those people who thought they were smarter than Obama!"

If you cannot trust this man to get his Spanish correct, can you really trust him with nukes? Clearly everything that comes out of his mouth is suspect.  Ha ha, just wanted to beat the conservative nuts to their punchline. Happy fifth of fourth.

You get the idea.    

And if one wants to be absolutely correct in this, Cinco de Mayo is not universally celebrated in Mexico, being celebrated primarily in the state of Puebla.    It is not a Mexican federal holiday but one observed voluntarily; strangely enough, mostly in the United States.  Many also refer to this day erroneously as Mexican Independence Day which is in fact 16 September (dieciséis de septiembre).




I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) Changes parties----AGAIN



Senator Arlen Specter has announced his intentions of switching to the Democrat party.  

What a surprise, coming from a man who had started his political career as a Democrat and has a fairly consistent record of voting Democrat and speaking against Republicans.

Hs first position was as assistant district attorney as a Democrat shortly after graduating from Yale law school and opening his own law firm.  In 1965 he ran for district attorney as a registered Democrat on the Republican ticket.  Only after winning the election did he change his party affiliation.

What kind of Republican did Specter become?  Remember when Robert Bork was a nominee for the supreme court?  Specters opposition was one of the leading causes for Borks failure to sit on the supreme court.  Fast forward to President Clintons impeachment.  Where was Specter?  On the side against impeachment.  On virtually every issue, with the exception of the Patriot Act, he has spoken out in opposition to President Bush.  The final straw came when he was one of three Senators to break Republican ranks and vote for the the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 on February 10, 2009.  

Although he stands with the Republicans on a few issues, such as crime and gun control, he is firmly with the Democrats as far as abortion (he supports pro-choice), affirmative action, minimum wage, immigration (he is supporting amnesty), and labor unions (he supports card check).  He was one of only four Republicans to vote against the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.   In 1995 he was the only Republican to vote to limit tax cuts to individuals with incomes of less than one million dollars.

A man of his word and strong integrity perhaps?  Perhaps not.  On March 18, 2009, Specter denied rumors that he was considering switching parties, pledging to run "as a Republican on the Republican ticket".  That changed today when he confirmed he will run as a Democrat in the 2010 election.  Nope.  As he did early on in his career, he merely switches parties when it is expedient to do so.  

How does a person wake up one day and "discover" he is no longer a Republican or Democrat?  There are core beliefs and principals involved here; major philosophical differences between the two parties, and these are not changed as easily as shirts.  Or perhaps they are with some people?





I can be E-mailed at outrider@ohnoanotherconservativeblog.com if you have suggestions, questions, or would like to see a particular story written.


 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Blog Software